AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 36:3:185-188 (1985)
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.

Cold Acclimation of Concord Grapevines. I. Variation in Cold Hardiness Within the Canopy

James A. Wolpert 1 and Gordon S. Howell 2

1 Dept. of Pomology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
2 Dept. Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

This study was designed to define a sampling protocol for fall acclimation experiments in Concord grapevines. Vineyard parameters which were investigated included vine size, number of clusters per shoot, exposure of shoots to sunlight, and node position on current season's growth. Primary buds and canes at the canopy exterior, well exposed to sunlight, were 6.5°C and 6.0°C hardier, respectively, than similar tissues from poorly exposed shoots on the canopy interior. Nodes from basal positions on shoots acclimated sooner than those from apical positions, especially early in the acclimation period (late August) and differences in hardiness between basal and apical positions were as great as 5.5°C for primary buds and 4.5°C for canes. Hardiness differences due to both sunlight exposure and node position were closely and inversely related to water content of the tissues. Neither vine size nor the number of clusters per shoot had an important effect on acclimation.

Submitted on May 10, 1984




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. G. Reynolds and J. E. Vanden Heuvel
Influence of Grapevine Training Systems on Vine Growth and Fruit Composition: A Review
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2009; 60(3): 251 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1985 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.