AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38:2:128-132 (1987)
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mc Intyre, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Mc Intyre, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Mc Intyre, G. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lider, L. A.

Some Limitations of the Degree Day System as Used in Viticulture in California

G. N. Mc Intyre 1, W. M. Kliewer 2, and L. A. Lider 2

1 University of Newcastle, N.S.W., Australia
2 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-5270.

The average and range in dates of budbreak, bloom, and fruit maturity of five grape cultivars grown in five different climatic regions of California were determined over a period of two to six years. For each cultivar and climatic region, a comparison of the variation in the average number of degree days and duration (in days) for three developmental periods (budbreak to bloom, bloom to fruit maturity (20°Brix), and budbreak to fruit maturity) was made. No statistically significant difference was observed between the two procedures. Determining the number of degree days by digitizing the area under the thermograph curves for five different locations gave degree day values for the period 1 April to 31 October that ranged 6% to 22% lower than the traditional method of mathematically averaging the maximum and minimum temperature per day. For a given cultivar, there were wide differences in the number of degree days required for the developmental periods between the five locations. Possible reasons for these differences are discussed. Submitted on July 25, 1986







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.