AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38:4:265-272 (1987)
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wample, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wample, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Schnabel, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wample, R. L.

Dormancy and Cold Hardiness in Vitis vinifera L. cv. White Riesling as Influenced by Photoperiod and Temperature

Barbara J. Schnabel 1 and Robert L. Wample 1

1 Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Washington State University Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Prosser, WA 99350.

Cold hardiness of Vitis vinifera L. cv. White Riesling was examined using controlled environments to establish the roles of photoperiod and temperature. Field-grown, potted plants were maintained for comparison. Gradually decreasing daylengths, when combined with constant warm temperatures, increased cane hardiness by 0.8°C, while primary bud hardiness was decreased by 2.7°C. Combining constant cool temperatures with gradually decreasing daylengths resulted in an increase in cane and primary bud hardiness of 1.3°C and 0.8°C, respectively. Long photoperiods and gradually decreasing temperatures increased cane and primary bud hardiness by 1.8°C and 1.1°C, respectively. Combining gradually decreasing temperatures and decreasing photoperiods was the most effective and caused increased hardiness of canes by 4.5°C and primary buds by 5.2°C, thus demonstrating a synergistic effect of these environmental factors. Depth of rest induced by these treatments was examined following cold hardiness evaluation. A chilling treatment facilitated the transition from dormancy to active growth.

Submitted on August 11, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. Keller and L. J. Mills
Effect of Pruning on Recovery and Productivity of Cold-Injured Merlot Grapevines
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2007; 58(3): 351 - 357.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.