AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38:4:287-292 (1987)
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Williams, L. E.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R. J.

Effect of Interior Canopy Defoliation on Berry Composition and Potassium Distribution in Thompson Seedless Grapevines

L. E. Williams 1, P. J. Biscay 1, and R. J. Smith 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648.

The interior portion of the Thompson Seedless grapevine canopy was defoliated approximately 950 `growing degree days' (GDDs) after budbreak in 1983 and 1984. Leaf area removed at that time was 9 m2 (1983) and 7 m2 (1984), which represented 35% and 27% of the total vine leaf area, respectively. Solar radiation penetration, when measured directly beneath the vine's canopy at soil level, increased from 40 µmol/m2/s for the control to 100 µmol/m2/s for the defoliated treatment. The amount of leaf dry matter lost subsequent to 1000 GDDs after budbreak was greater for the control than for the defoliated treatment. Leaf removal from the interior of the vine had no significant effect on fruit maturation characteristics in either year. In addition, there was no treatment effect on berry potassium concentration. A net loss of K from the stems of the vine prior to fruit harvest was measured, while there was no loss of K from the leaves throughout the season that could not be accounted for due to leaf fall or shoot trimming. The results indicate that the majority of K in fruit of Thompson Seedless grapevines comes either from the soil or the permanent structures of the vines during the course of berry growth with little redistribution from the current season's growth of leaves or stems under the conditions of this study.

Submitted on September 3, 1986




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
W. M. Kliewer and N. K. Dokoozlian
Leaf Area/Crop Weight Ratios of Grapevines: Influence on Fruit Composition and Wine Quality
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2005; 56(2): 170 - 181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.