AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38:4:326-328 (1987)
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hatch, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ruiz, M.

Influence of Pruning Date on Budbreak of Desert Table Grapes

Robert L. Hatch 1 and Manuel Ruiz 2

1 Cactus Lane Ranch, P. O. Box 144, Waddell, AZ 85355
2 Apartado Postal 627, Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico.

For three years, Perlette, Cardinal, and Thompson Seedless vines were pruned at two-week intervals from late November to early February. Results indicate a higher percent and more even budbreak of both Perlette and Thompson Seedless when pruned during January; Cardinals were less sensitive to pruning dates. Observations also indicate that earlier bloom and subsequent harvest coincide with optimum pruning dates. Accumulated winter chilling to determine optimum pruning dates is suggested as a means of improving desert table grape production.

Submitted on February 22, 1987







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1987 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.