AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 39:3:205-212 (1988)
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.

Response of Okanagan Riesling Vines to Training System and Simulated Mechanical Pruning

A. G. Reynolds 1

1 Agriculture Canada Research Station, Summerland, B.C., Canada

Ten-year-old Okanagan Riesling vines were subjected over three growing seasons to two pruning strategies (18 nodes/m row and simulated mechanical pruning; SMP) within each of three training systems (midwire bilateral cordon, MBC; Hudson River Umbrella, HRU; and Lenz Moser, LM). SMP reduced vine size, cluster weight, berries/cluster, and berry weight but led to substantial increases in shoots/vine and yield. Titratable acidity (TA), °Brix, and Botrytis-infected fruit were also reduced by SMP. Shoots/vine, yield, and vine size were maximized by MBC training; however, °Brix was reduced, TA and pH were elevated, and Botrytis-infected fruit increased when combined with SMP. Point quadrat analysis indicated MBC to have the densest canopy containing the greatest number of leaf contacts, while this technique combined with photometric measurements revealed MBC to possess minimal cluster exposure. SMP vines tended to have fewer canopy contacts than their manually pruned counterparts. Wine quality and aroma intensity were best in wines from manually pruned HRU-trained fruit. SMP tended to reduce wine quality compared to manual pruning.

Key words: training system, mechanical pruning, pruning, canopy management, Okanagan Riesling

Submitted on November 9, 1987







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1988 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.