|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Plant Pathology and Cell Interaction Research Group, University of
California, Riverside, CA 92521
2 Department of Plant Pathology, University of California,
Davis, CA 95616
With the recent evidence of the almost ubiquitous occurrence of grapevine viroids in California, intriguing questions have arisen concerning the significance of viroids to vine growth and productivity. Of fundamental importance in addressing these considerations is an understanding of the manner in which such a general distribution of grapevine viroids has been accomplished. GV1, GV2, and GV3 were demonstrated to be transmissible agents in Emperor seedlings and viroid-free, shoot tip cultured Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines. Analyses of multiple selections of these varieties have never detected the presence of GV2. Therefore, the transmission of GV2 in these tests suggests that these varieties are not resistant to GV2, but probably have never been exposed to this viroid. A survey of samples taken from the rootstock collection at the University of California, Davis, detected at least one grapevine viroid in all varieties tested. Two of the newly released rootstock varieties tested contained an unusually high concentration of the less commonly found GV2. Therefore, two possible sources for the spread of grapevine viroids have been identified: (1) mechanical inoculation among vines, which might be accomplished during routine cultural practices; and (2) systemic transmission between grafted rootstocks and scion varieties containing grapevine viroids.
Key words: viroids, grapevine viroids (GV1, GV2, GV3), viroid transmission
Submitted on November 19, 1987
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |