AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 40:2:109-120 (1989)
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wardle, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wardle, D. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wardle, D. A.

Effects of Timing and Severity of Summer Hedging on Growth, Yield, Fruit Composition, and Canopy Characteristics of de Chaunac. I. Canopy Characteristics and Growth Parameters

Andrew G. Reynolds 1 and Douglas A. Wardle 1

1 Agriculture Canada Research Station, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada V0H 1Z0.

Vigorous de Chaunac vines were subjected to a combination of one of three hedging severities (5, 10, or 15 leaves retained per shoot), one of three timings of hedging (postbloom, lag phase, veraison) and a non-hedged control over a three-season period. Vine vigor decreased linearly as hedging severity was increased, while count shoots and percent budbreak were reduced proportionally by delays in hedging as well as by increases in hedging severity. Leaf area per shoot, per main shoot, and per vine tended to decrease in proportion to severity and lateness of hedging, but vines hedged severely at postbloom had relatively high leaf areas due to lateral shoot growth. Canopy density decreased and fruit exposure increased as hedging became more severe or was delayed. Length and depth of canopy were both reduced by increases in severity of and delays in timing of hedging. Nearly all hedging treatments reduced vine vigor and leaf area compared to the control but had minor impact on shoot production. Use of severe postbloom hedging may lead to improvements in canopy characteristics with minimal reductions in vine vigor and winter cold tolerance.

Key words: canopy management, hedging, de Chaunac

Submitted on September 6, 1988







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1989 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.