AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 41:3:251-260 (1990)
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hamman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, H. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Hamman, R. A., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, H. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Hamman, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, H. G.

Pruning Effects on Cold Hardiness and Water Content During Deacclimation of Merlot Bud and Cane Tissues

Richard A. Hamman Jr. 1, A. R. Renquist 2, and H. G. Hughes 3

1 Colorado State University - Orchard Mesa Research Center, Grand Junction, CO 81503
2 Colorado State University - Orchard Mesa Research Center, Grand Junction, CO 81503
3 Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.

Computer assisted thermal analysis was used to measure deep supercooling in dormant bud and cane tissue of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Merlot during a five-week deacclimation period. The weekly low temperature exotherm (LTE), an indicator of hardiness, of both cane (internode) and primary bud tissue, responded to increases in air temperatures, with bud tissue responding faster than cane tissue. Bud tissue from pruned and unpruned canes retained the capacity to supercool until early bud swell. Cane tissue had lower LTEs than bud tissue on each date and was able to supercool past the time of bud swell. Pruning treatments did not influence the loss of hardiness in either bud or cane tissue. Water content of canes was more affected by all three factors (date, position, and pruning) than was hardiness. Bud water content was lower than cane water content for every date and each position throughout the study. Cane water content increased with distance from the trunk. Observations during the three weeks before bud swell indicate that cane tissue hydrates rapidly but dehardens only slowly, while buds deharden more quickly and yet have only a small increase in bulk water content. Pruning slowed the rate of cane hydration during the week it was most rapid, especially at the most distal position.

Key words: Vitis vinifera, thermal analysis, low temperature exotherm

Submitted on June 28, 1989







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1990 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.