AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 42:3:180-190 (1991)
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Conradie, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Conradie, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Conradie, W. J.

Distribution and Translocation of Nitrogen Absorbed During Early Summer by Two-Year-Old Grapevines Grown in Sand Culture

W. J. Conradie 1

1 Viticultural and Oenological Research Institute (VORI), Private Bag X5026, 7600 Stellenbosch, Republic of South Africa.

The grapevine shows a critical demand for nitrogen (N) during early summer (end of rapid shoot growth up to veraison). The distribution and translocation of N applied during this period were quantified for Chenin blanc grapevines grown in sand culture. Vines, in their second growing season, were labeled with 15N over a 25-day period starting at the end of rapid shoot growth (berry size: 8 mm in diameter). After labeling, the vines received standard Hoagland solution for the rest of the investigation period. Entire vines were subsequently sampled seven times over a period of 10 months: i.e., four times during the latter part of the second, and three times during the first part of the third growing season. At the first sampling date (veraison), 52% of the labeled N was found in the vegetative growth, 28% in the bunches, and 20% in the permanent structure. Between veraison and harvest, 34%, 23%, and 35% of the amounts of labeled N in the shoots, leaves, and permanent structure, respectively, were lost, presumably being translocated to the bunches. It is suggested that these figures can be regarded as realistic estimates of N turnover during the relevant period. At harvest, bunches contained 46%, vegetative growth 41%, and the permanent structure 13% of the labeled N. This distribution appears to be fixed for all N absorbed from the end of bloom up to veraison by vines with a realistic ratio for yield to vegetative growth.

Key words: nitrogen, grapevine, distribution, translocation, summer-applied N, partitioning

Submitted on August 6, 1990







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.