AJEV AJEV Best Papers - Free Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 42:3:191-198 (1991)
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Striegler, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Striegler, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Striegler, R. K.

Influence of Training System and Pruning Severity on Yield, Vine Size, and Fruit Composition of Vignoles Grapevines

G. Stanley Howell 1, David P. Miller 1, Charles E. Edson 1, and R. Keith Striegler 1

1 Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Vignoles grapevines were trained to four training systems: (1) high cordon - a bilateral cordon at the top wire (1.8 m); (2) low cordon - a bilateral cordon at the bottom wire (1.0 m); (3) high head - a head with the trunk maintained at or just below the top wire; and (4) low head - a low head with the trunk maintained at or just above the bottom wire. In addition, three pruning severities were applied (15 + 15, 20 + 20, and 25 + 25). Data were collected over a seven-year period from 1983 through 989. The vines were evaluated for yield, vine size maintenance, fruit quality, winter damage, and vine canopy characteristics. Vines trained to the high cordon system were superior to other training systems in yield and the equivalent or better than other systems with relation to vine size and fruit maturity indices. Tentatively, we propose that crop may be controlled via a linear pruning severity of 15 + 15.

Key words: canopy microclimate, trellising, pruning

Submitted on July 25, 1990




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
B. P. Bordelon, P. A. Skinkis, and P. H. Howard
Impact of Training System on Vine Performance and Fruit Composition of Traminette
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 39 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.