AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 42:3:199-208 (1991)
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Monteiro, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bisson, L. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Monteiro, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bisson, L. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Monteiro, F. F.
Right arrow Articles by Bisson, L. F.

Amino Acid Utilization and Urea Formation During Vinification Fermentations

Francisco F. Monteiro 1 and Linda F. Bisson 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8749

The pattern of amino acid utilization was examined in two commercial yeast strains, Montrachet (UCD 522) and Prise de Mousse (Red Star, Universal Foods Corporation) in two grape juices, a pink juice concentrate obtained from the E. & J. Gallo Winery and a Sauvignon blanc juice much less rich in nitrogen. Utilization of nitrogen-containing compounds was markedly similar in these two yeast strains. Prise de Mousse consistently displayed faster fermentation rates and time to dryness, which was particularly striking in the Sauvignon blanc juice which had a much lower total nitrogen content. The release and reutilization of urea was monitored for both strains. Higher medium levels of urea were observed with Montrachet as compared to Prise de Mousse, but levels were similar following greatly extended (eight months) lees contact. Both yeasts displayed significant intracellular levels of urea during the course of fermentation, but the urea remained largely intracellular in Prise de Mousse throughout, while in Montrachet urea was released to the surrounding medium.

Key words: amino acid, ethyl carbamate, urea

Submitted on February 11, 1991




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
J. Coulon, J. I. Husnik, D. L. Inglis, G. K. van der Merwe, A. Lonvaud, D. J. Erasmus, and H. J.J. van Vuuren
Metabolic Engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Minimize the Production of Ethyl Carbamate in Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2006; 57(2): 113 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.Home page
J.-M. Salmon and P. Barre
Improvement of Nitrogen Assimilation and Fermentation Kinetics under Enological Conditions by Derepression of Alternative Nitrogen-Assimilatory Pathways in an Industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strain
Appl. Envir. Microbiol., October 1, 1998; 64(10): 3831 - 3837.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.