AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 42:3:227-232 (1991)
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, M. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, M. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, M. L.

Potassium Fertilization of Thompson Seedless Grapevines Using Fertilizer Sources Under Drip Irrigation

L. Peter Christensen 1, William L. Peacock 2, and Mary L. Bianchi 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, and Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, CA 93648
2 University of California Cooperative Extension, Agricultural Building, County Civic Center, Visalia, CA 93291.

Drip irrigation is suitable for injection of soluble fertilizer due to ease in uniformity of application and efficiency of placement. A potassium (K) fertilization trial was initiated in 1984 to determine the influence of rate, frequency of application, and K source on correcting K deficiency in a drip irrigated vineyard. Own-rooted Thompson Seedless vines on a K deficient sandy loam soil were used for study. The eight treatments compared two rates (0.1 and 0.2 kg K/vine) of two K sources (K2SO4 and KCl) under two application methods--single treatment (1x) and weekly partitioned treatment (8x) over 8 weeks. Single treatment (1x) of higher rates of K2SO4 at 0.4 and 0.8 kg K/vine as well as 0 fertilizer were also compared. Vine response as measured by bloom petiole K levels was most immediate with the lx applications but by veraison in the year of treatment the partitioned 8x applications resulted in higher petiole K. Thereafter, in 1985 and 1986, application method (lx vs. 8x) did not show differences in influencing petiole K. Fertilizer rate treatments increased petiole K and reduced visual K deficiency symptoms linearly. All fertilizer treatments showed response in petiole K increase and visual symptom reduction for two seasons, 1984 and 1985. However, by 1986 only the lx treatments continued to show higher petiole K than 0 fertilizer. Petiole Cl was increased with Cl as a K source but without apparent Cl toxicity problems. No other differences due to K source (SO4 vs. Cl) were shown except for higher petiole K from SO4 in one year of measurement, 1985. Soil samples taken in December of 1984 at incremental distances from the emitter showed greatest concentration of K directly below the emitter for the low lx and all 8x treatments. Highest 1x treatment rates increased K levels at the 0.5 m distance and depth. The study demonstrates the feasibility of K fertilizer application to vineyard under drip irrigation as lx or partitioned treatment at varying rates of K2SO4 and KCl. Higher rates of K2SO4 at 0.4 kg K and above can provide correction beyond two years in the soil type studied here. Rates of KCl above 0.2 kg K/vine were not used in the study to avoid possible Cl toxicity problems.

Key words: potassium, irrigation, drip, Thompson Seedless

Submitted on June 28, 1989







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.