AJEV AJEV Best Papers - Free Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 43:3:230-232 (1992)
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. R.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Morris, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Clark, J. R.

Storage of New Seedless Grape Cultivar with Sulfur Dioxide Generators

J. R. Morris 1, O. L. Oswald 1, G. L. Main 1, J. N. Moore 2, and J. R. Clark 2

1 Department of Food Science University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703.
2 Department of Horticulture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72703.

Two new University of Arkansas table grape cultivars, Reliance (25% Vitis vinifera L. x 75% Vitis labrusca L.) and Saturn (78% Vitis vinifera L. x 22% Vitis labrusca L.), were stored for seven and 10 weeks at 2°C in corrugated cardboard shipping containers with five packing treatments (slow, dual, and quick-release SO2 generators and lined and unlined controls). The SO2 treatments consisted of placing grapes in shipping containers lined with unvented polyethylene bags, laying commercially available SO2 generators on top of the grapes, and closing the bag. The lined control had a closed polyethylene bag surrounding the grapes but no SO2, while the unlined control had neither SO2 nor polyethylene bag. Reliance grapes had higher percentages of decay and shatter than Saturn grapes. Grapes stored with SO2 generators had less decay than the controls. The unlined control had more than four times the percentage weight loss of any other treatment. Flavor was similar among all treatments. The SO2 generators had no effect on color. Grapes that were wrapped and stored with no SO2 had the greatest amount of berry shatter. Grapes stored with the dual-release SO2 generators had less shatter than with the slow-release SO2 generators. Stem appearance was maintained by the slow-release and dual-release treatments. The use of SO2 generators had no effect on percentage soluble solids or pH.

Key words: Reliance, Saturn, cold storage, SO2, table grapes

Submitted on July 1, 1991







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.