AJEV AJEV Best Papers - Free Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:2:181-187 (1994)
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koblet, W.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Koblet, W.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Koblet, W.
Right arrow Articles by Howell, G. S.

Influence of Leaf Removal, Rootstock, and Training System on Yield and Fruit Composition of Pinot noir Grapevines

Werner Koblet 1, M. Carmo Candolfi-Vasconcelos 1, Walter Zweifel 2, and G. Stanley Howell 3

1 Swiss Federal Research Station for Fruit-Growing, Viticulture and Horticulture, CH-8820 Wädenswil, Switzerland
2 Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Inst. of Plant Science, ETH-Z, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland
3 Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

A factorial designed experiment was used to vary leaf removal, rootstock, and training system of Pinot noir grapevines during two seasons. Defoliation consisted of 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, or 10 main leaves removed acropetally from the shoot base six weeks after full bloom (pea-size). 3309C and 101-14 Mgt were used as rootstocks, and the training systems used were the traditional low-head, cane pruned system (double Guyot), with an undivided canopy, or a variant with a divided trunk structure having a greater amount of two-year-old and older wood. Total yield and yield of sound fruit was reduced as leaf area decreased. Total yield was higher on vines grafted to 101-14 Mgt, but so was the amount of diseased fruit. Fruit yield showed a clear positive relationship with trunk volume. Yield reduction due to defoliation or rootstock was mainly the result of reduced berry weight. Fruit composition was influenced by defoliation and trunk volume; °Brix and pH declined with increasing level of leaf removal and increased with increasing trunk volume. These data suggest that evaluation of training system choice should include the amount of two-year-old and older wood, since even small amounts (<10% of total) resulted in significant impact on vine growth, yield components, and fruit composition.

Key words: defoliation, training system, trunk volume, rootstock, yield, fruit composition

Submitted on July 22, 1992




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Exp BotHome page
G. Lebon, G. Wojnarowiez, B. Holzapfel, F. Fontaine, N. Vaillant-Gaveau, and C. Clement
Sugars and flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.)
J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2008; 59(10): 2565 - 2578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. J. Benz, M. M. Anderson, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Performance of Three Malbec Clones on Two Rootstocks in Oakville, Napa Valley, California
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2007; 58(2): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.