AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:3:341-344 (1994)
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, A. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Park, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Noble, A. C.

Incidence of Volatile Sulfur Compounds in California Wines. A Preliminary Survey

Seung K. Park 1, Roger B. Boulton 1, Enric Bartra 2, and Ann C. Noble 1

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, U.S.A.
2 INCAVI, 08827 Vilafranca del Penedès, Barcelona, Spain

Wines reported to have sulfide-related off-odors were analyzed for volatile sulfur compounds by headspace gas chromatography using a flame photometric detector. Fifty-seven of the 77 wines submitted by 19 wineries in California had one or more volatile sulfur compounds present at concentrations above threshold levels. Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) was the most widely distributed compound and present at the highest levels. Ethanethiol (EtSH) and diethyl disulfide (DEDS) were present in most Cabernet Sauvignon and Merlot and in white wines made from Pinot noir, with a lower incidence in Sauvignon blanc and Chardonnay wines. Methanethiol (MeSH) was only found in nine of 19 Pinot noir wines. In the present study, distinct off-odors resulted from very high levels of EtSH (12 wines), DEDS (6), DMS (5) and MeSH (3). In contrast, 17 of the 77 wines contained volatile sulfur compounds at trace, sub-threshold levels, while three wines had none detectable, suggesting that sulfide-like odor problems may arise from non-sulfur containing compounds or possibly sulfur compounds not detectable by this headspace procedure.

Key words: volatile sulfur compounds, gas chromatography, wine, dimethyl sulfide, diethyl disulfide, ethanethiol, methanethiol

Submitted on July 26, 1993







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.