|
|
||||||||
1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University
of California, Davis, CA 95616-8749.
Root distributions of the grapevine rootstocks AXR#1,110R, and St. George were examined at the UC Oakville
Experimental Vineyard. Four trenches 1.2m deep were excavated 5 cm from the vine trunk for every rootstock
and the presence of roots recorded. Root intersections with the trench profile were classified according to size
(<2 mm,
2 and <5 mm,
5 and <12 mm,
12 mm). The soil at the site is a Bale (variant) gravelly loam for the
top 10 to 30 cm, becoming a very gravelly clay loam to a depth of 100 cm and then an extremely gravelly clay
loam to 165 cm. In addition to mapping roots, soil samples along the trench profiles were analyzed for their
percent sand, silt and clay contents to determine any trench-specific textural changes. A log transformation of
the root count data was used to prevent violation of the homogeneity of variance assumption necessary for
analysis of variance. Root frequencies for all size classes were then analyzed for correlation to depth or
rootstock using analysis of variance with a repeated measures design. Root numbers from each size class of
roots varied significantly with depth. Root frequencies varied significantly with rootstock for the smallest size
class and total root number. A test of rootstock-depth interactions was significant for the two intermediate size
classes. These interactions and conservative mean separation tests suggest that St. George has a different
distribution pattern than either 110R or AXR#1. St. George also had the highest total root number. This is in
agreement with six year averages of pruning weights which indicate that St. George had the heaviest one-year-old prunings and the lowest yield/pruning weight ratio.
Key words: root distribution, Cabernet Sauvignon
Submitted on September 30, 1992
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. R. Smart, E. Schwass, A. Lakso, and L. Morano Grapevine Rooting Patterns: A Comprehensive Analysis and a Review Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2006; 57(1): 89 - 104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |