AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 45:4:393-400 (1994)
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Weber, E.

Field Performance of Six Chardonnay Clones in the Napa Valley

J. A. Wolpert 1, A. N. Kasimatis 1, and E. Weber 2

1 Department of Viticulture & Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
2 University of California Cooperative Extension, Napa County.

Viticultural performance of six certified, virus-tested clones of Chardonnay from Foundation Plant Materials Service (FPMS), University of California, Davis, was determined at two sites in the Napa Valley. Vine growth (as weight of one-year-dormant cane prunings), yield, cluster number, cluster weight, berry weight, and fruit maturity indices (°Brix, titratable acidity, and pH) were measured over a four-year period, 1988 through 1991. Performance of clones was very similar at the two sites. FPMS clones 6 and 15 had the greatest growth, about 3 kg/vine, while FPMS 14 had the least growth, 1.0 kg/vine. Highest yields were seen in FPMS 5, FPMS 4, and FPMS 6 (about 10.5 to 13 kg/vine), followed by FPMS 14 and FPMS 15 (9 to 10 kg/vine), and last in FPMS 16 (about 4.5 kg/vine). FPMS 4 and FPMS 5 had the heaviest clusters (more than 200 g) and FPMS 16 the lightest (less than 100 g). FPMS 4, FPMS 5, and FPMS 14 had the greatest numbers of berries/cluster (about 160) followed by FPMS 6 with 120, FPMS 15 at 110, and FPMS 16 at about 65. FPMS 16 had the greatest average berry weight, and FPMS 14 had the least. The clonal influence on fruit maturity was not great, except that the pH of FPMS 16 fruit was typically 0.1 to 0.2 units higher than other clones.

Key words: Chardonnay, selection, clone, clonal selection

Submitted on December 2, 1993




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. M. Anderson, R. J. Smith, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Evaluation of French and California Pinot noir Clones Grown for Production of Sparkling Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. M. Anderson, R. J. Smith, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Evaluation of French and California Chardonnay Clones Grown for Production of Sparkling Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. J. Benz, M. M. Anderson, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Performance of Three Malbec Clones on Two Rootstocks in Oakville, Napa Valley, California
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2007; 58(2): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. W. Fidelibus, L. P. Christensen, D. G. Katayama, and P.-T. Verdenal
Yield Components and Fruit Composition of Six Chardonnay Grapevine Clones in the Central San Joaquin Valley, California
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2006; 57(4): 503 - 506.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. J. Benz, M. M. Anderson, M. A. Williams, K. Barnhisel, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Performance of Five Merlot Clones in Oakville, Napa Valley
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2006; 57(2): 233 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.