The Light Environment Within Grapevine Canopies. I. Description and Seasonal Changes During Fruit Development

¹ Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8749.

University of California, Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 South Riverbend Avenue, Parlier, California 93648.

Seasonal changes in the light environment within Cabernet Sauvignon (Vitis vinifera L.) grapevine canopies was examined in eight commercial vineyards in the North Coast of California. Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD), the ratio of red (R) to far-red (FR) light (R:FR) and percentage of canopy area receiving sunflecks were determined along a vertical transect in the center of the vine row and along a horizontal transect in the fruit zone at berry set, veraison and harvest. Leaf area density (m² leaf area per meter canopy or row length) was also determined at each site at each of the above mentioned stages of fruit development. PPFD, R:FR and sunflecks decreased markedly beneath the canopy surface, and continued to decline along the vertical transect from the top of the canopy to the fruit zone. PPFD, R:FR and sunflecks reached their lowest values near the fruit zone, then increased from the fruit zone to the ground. A close, positive relationship between PPFD (log % ambient) and R:FR within the canopy was found. PPFD in the fruit zone at harvest ranged from 7.7 (Site 1, leaf area density = 2.2 m² m^-1 canopy length) to 0.3% (Site 8, leaf area density = 12.2 m² m^-1 canopy length) of ambient, while R:FR in the fruit zone at harvest ranged from 0.49 (Site 1) to 0.05 (Site 6, leaf area density = 11.3 m² m^-1 canopy length). The canopy surface in the fruit zone illuminated by sunflecks at harvest ranged from 30% (Site 1) to nil (Sites 6 and 8). Despite a near doubling of leaf area between berry set and harvest at some sites, only minimal changes in canopy light environment were observed during fruit development. The results indicated that PPFD in the canopy interior was reduced to 1% or less of ambient, while R:FR and sunflecks were reduced to 10% or less of ambient, when leaf area exceeded 8 m² m^-1 canopy length. In contrast, PPFD, R:FR and sunflecks were 10% or more of their ambient values when leaf area was 4 m² m^-1 canopy length.

Key words: Vitis vinifera L., canopy development, canopy light environment, light quality, light quantity

Submitted on April 19, 1993

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. M. Meyers and J. E. Vanden Heuvel Enhancing the Precision and Spatial Acuity of Point Quadrat Analyses via Calibrated Exposure Mapping Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2008; 59(4): 425 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bavaresco, M. Gatti, S. Pezzutto, M. Fregoni, and F. Mattivi Effect of Leaf Removal on Grape Yield, Berry Composition, and Stilbene Concentration Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2008; 59(3): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S.-H. Lee, M.-J. Seo, M. Riu, J. P. Cotta, D. E. Block, N. K. Dokoozlian, and S. E. Ebeler Vine Microclimate and Norisoprenoid Concentration in Cabernet Sauvignon Grapes and Wines Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2007; 58(3): 291 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Kliewer and N. K. Dokoozlian Leaf Area/Crop Weight Ratios of Grapevines: Influence on Fruit Composition and Wine Quality Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2005; 56(2): 170 - 181. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]