AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:4:437-441 (1995)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Verdegaal, P. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Verdegaal, P. S.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Wolpert, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Verdegaal, P. S.

Viticultural Performance of Seven Cabernet Sauvignon Clones in the Northern San Joaquin Valley, California

J. A. Wolpert 1, A. N. Kasimatis 1, and P. S. Verdegaal 2

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
2 University of California Cooperative Extension, San Joaquin County, Stockton, CA.

Seven Cabernet Sauvignon clones from Foundation Plant Materials Service (FPMS), University of California, were evaluated over a three-year period in the Lodi-Woodbridge District of the northern San Joaquin Valley, California. FPMS 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, and 21 were all certified virus-tested. FPMS 6 had the greatest pruning weight (2.8 kg vine-1) while FPMS 8 and 10 had the least (2.0 and 1.9 kg vine-1, respectively). FPMS 6 had the lowest average yield (7.0 kg vine-1) while FPMS 21 had the highest average yield (9.7 kg vine-l). Vine yield was highly correlated (r2 = 0.96) with cluster weight while cluster numbers did not differ. Contributions to cluster weight were made by both berries per cluster and berry weight. Despite yield differences of 2.7 kg vine-1, average °Brix varied by only 1.2°. Titratable acidity and pH differences were negligible.

Key words: Cabernet Sauvignon, selection, clone, clonal selection

Submitted on February 9, 1995




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. M. Anderson, R. J. Smith, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Evaluation of French and California Pinot noir Clones Grown for Production of Sparkling Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 188 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. M. Anderson, R. J. Smith, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Evaluation of French and California Chardonnay Clones Grown for Production of Sparkling Wine
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2008; 59(1): 73 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. J. Benz, M. M. Anderson, M. A. Williams, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Performance of Three Malbec Clones on Two Rootstocks in Oakville, Napa Valley, California
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2007; 58(2): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
V. Nuzzo and M. A. Matthews
Response of Fruit Growth and Ripening to Crop Level in Dry-Farmed Cabernet Sauvignon on Four Rootstocks
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2006; 57(3): 314 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
G. I. Mercado-Martin, J. A. Wolpert, and R. J. Smith
Viticultural Evaluation of Eleven Clones and Two Field Selections of Pinot noir Grown for Production of Sparkling Wine in Los Carneros, California
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2006; 57(3): 371 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. J. Benz, M. M. Anderson, M. A. Williams, K. Barnhisel, and J. A. Wolpert
Viticultural Performance of Five Merlot Clones in Oakville, Napa Valley
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2006; 57(2): 233 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.