AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:4:493-498 (1995)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, C. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Christensen, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Lynn, C. D.

The Effects of Harvest Date on Thompson Seedless Grapes and Raisins. II. Relationships of Fruit Quality Factors

L. Peter Christensen 1, Mary L. Bianchi 2, Martin W. Miller 3, Amand N. Kasimatis 4, and Curtis D. Lynn 5

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, Univ. of California, Davis and Kearney Agricultural Center, 9240 S. Riverbend Ave., Parlier, CA 93648
2 University of California Cooperative Extension, 2156 Sierra Way, Suite C, San Luis Obispo, CA 93401
3 Department of Food Science and Technology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
4 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
5 University of California Cooperative Extension, Visalia, CA 93291.

The fresh fruit and raisin composition and quality factors measured during a three-year Thompson Seedless raisin harvest study were compared by regression analysis to determine their relationships and suitability as predictors of raisin quality. Raisin quality was measured with the airstream sorter as percent B and better (%B&B) and percent Substandard (%Sstnd) raisin grades. The relationship of fresh fruit soluble solids (SS) to the drying ratio of raisins was also analyzed. The main fruit measurements analyzed as a predictor of raisin quality were fresh fruit SS and titratable acidity (TA) and raisin reducing sugars (RS) and TA. Soluble solids and drying ratio showed a highly significant linear relationship, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.9445, but with a different calculated product of their values as compared to earlier reports. Fresh fruit SS and TA were curvilinear and linear, respectively, to %B&B raisin grade. The relationship of fresh fruit TA to %B&B raisin grade is explained by TA's curvilinear relationship to SS rather than a direct effect of TA on raisin quality. The regression comparison of the RS and TA content of raisins showed a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.7474) and both showed a highly significant linear relationship to %B&B and %Sstnd raisin grades. Many of the parameters showed relationships similar to those found in earlier studies, including the fresh fruit SS and raisin TA correlation to raisin quality; some differences indicate need for further study under more current raisin grape growing conditions.

Key words: Vitis, grapes, raisins, Thompson Seedless, composition, quality

Submitted on November 29, 1994







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.