AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:4:529-541 (1995)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by De La Presa-Owens, C.
Right arrow Articles by De La Torre-Boronat, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by De La Presa-Owens, C.
Right arrow Articles by De La Torre-Boronat, M. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by De La Presa-Owens, C.
Right arrow Articles by De La Torre-Boronat, M. C.

Characterization of Macabeo, Xarel.lo, and Parellada White Wines from the Penedès Region. II

Cristina De La Presa-Owens 1, Rosa Ma Lamuela-Raventos 1, Susana Buxaderas 1, and Ma Carmen De La Torre-Boronat 1

1 Area de Nutrición y Bromatología. Facultad de Farmacia. Universidad de Barcelona. Av. Joan XXIII, s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

Experimental research was done, based on 60 white wine samples, identified through 120 analytical variables, and submitted to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and principal component analysis (PCA). Wines were from three varieties of white Vitis vinifera grapes (Macabeo, Xarel.lo, and Parellada) that are used in the production of Spanish sparkling wines. Wines were collected from two wineries (A and B) and eight area cooperatives (C) from the Penedès region, during three consecutive years (1990, 1991, 1992). The purpose of this study was to identify the analytical characteristics which distinguish these three varieties, thus allowing differentiation according to vintage year or winery. Many of the compounds were found to be significantly different according to variety, vintage year, or winery when ANOVA was performed. Results show that by PCA some polyphenolic compounds such as trans-coutaric acid, trans-caftaric acid, total caftaric acid (trans-caftaric acid + S-glutathionylcaftaric acid + trans-caffeic acid), trans-coutaric/trans-caftaric acid ratio, syringic acid, and epicatechin were responsible for the differentiation of wines according to variety, while ggr-butyrolactone, ethyl lactate, hexanoic acid, diacetaldehyde, methyl acetate, ethyl acetate, isoamyl alcohol, propanol, methanol, isobutanol, total phenol, and flavonoid content separated wines according to vintage year. Finally, a clear differentiation according to winery was obtained by Orn, Gln, ethanolamine, Lys, isoamyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, hexyl acetate, ethyl hexanoate, cis-3-hexenol acetate, butyl acetate, 2-phenethyl acetate, methanol, and isobutanol.

Key words: differentiation, characterization, white wine, variety, vintage

Submitted on May 31, 1994







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.