AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 46:4:571-578 (1995)
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Deloire, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gimonnet, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Deloire, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gimonnet, G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Deloire, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gimonnet, G.

Micropropagation of the Grapevine: Results of 10 Years of Experiments in the Champagne Vineyard and Results of the First Vinifications

A. Deloire 1, M. Charpentier 1, G. Berlioz 1, A. Colin 1, and G. Gimonnet 1

1 Socété Moët et Chandon, B.P. 140, F51333 Epernay Cédex, France.

The traditional technique of grapevine propagation through woody grafting multiplication could be usefully complemented by the in vitro micro-propagation process and by the green grafting method. In this work, the possibilities and limits of the in vitro propagation process were studied. About two hectares of experimental in vitro grapevines were planted in a Champagne vineyard, and their viticultural and enological characteristics were studied over a period of 10 years. Compared to control vines, no morphological difference and no phylloxera damage were observed on the 41B (Vitis vinifera cv. Chasselas x Vitis berlandieri) and 333EM (Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon x Vitis berlandieri) from in vitro propagated vines, planted in the field in 1985, after the plants had reached eight years of age. However, some leaves and one-year-old stem of in vitro propagated Chardonnay and Pinot noir vines showed some vegetative differences compared to the control vines. As a consequence of poor flower differentiation, the in vitro grapevine production was about 50% lower than the production from control vines for the four first years, but the developed berries were normal (shape, size, maturity). All abnormal differences progressively disappeared after seven years. In vitro and control fermentation and tasting results from 1989 to 1993 were similar. No significant preferences in Chardonnay and Pinot noir base wines from micro-propagation and control grapevines were detected by a panel of trained judges.

Key words: grapevine propagation, in vitro propagation

Submitted on August 24, 1994







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1995 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.