AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 52:2:101-108 (2001)
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lefort, F.
Right arrow Articles by Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. K.A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lefort, F.
Right arrow Articles by Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. K.A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Lefort, F.
Right arrow Articles by Roubelakis-Angelakis, K. K.A.

Genetic Comparison of Greek Cultivars of Vitis vinifera L. by Nuclear Microsatellite Profiling

François Lefort 1 and Kalliopi K.A. Roubelakis-Angelakis 1

1 Laboratory of Plant Physiology and Biotechnology, Department of Biology, University of Crete, P.O. Box 2208, 71 409 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.

email: flefort{at}biology.uoc.gr

We have initiated the characterization of the Greek genetic resources of Vitis vinifera L. through microsatellite profiling, with the aim of providing accurate identification of Greek cultivars and compiling the molecular data together with available ampelographic information in the form of a web-based database. This work reports microsatellite profiling results obtained on 50 Greek grapevine cultivars, including major wine and table grape cultivars, at 11 microsatellite (SSR; simple sequence repeats) loci. The choice of nine previously characterized SSR markers, which have been used in other European studies, makes our results comparable at these loci to those of other laboratories and will contribute to the ongoing international effort of genotype identification. Furthermore, 6 out of the 11 SSR markers used are subject to an international investigation in order to assay their usefulness as descriptors. The 11 SSR markers used in this study proved to be informative, with a total number of 87 alleles and a mean of 7.9 alleles per locus. The observed heterozygosity at each locus ranged from 0.68 to 0.96. The cumulative probability of identity (PI) between two cultivars by using these 11 markers was 2.218 x 10-10, corresponding to the statistical potential to distinguish 94,000 unrelated cultivars. This cumulative PI was lower than reported in previous studies using a slightly different set of markers. Three pairs of synonyms were found. Further genotyping at six more loci confirmed synonymy in two cases (Fileri Mantineias and Moschofilero; Moschato Mazas and Moschato Kerkyras), while the third (Fokiano and Giouroukiko) was invalidated at two loci, sustaining the hypothesis that both cultivars could be clones of the same cultivar. On the other hand, homonymy such as Roditis kokkinos and Roditis lefkos and Romeiko and Romeiko Machaira did not overlap any genetic synonymy. In three other cases, two cultivars differed only in one out of 22 alleles with the consequence that these pairs of cultivars can be considered as clones.

Note:
Acknowledgments: This work was supported by INTERREG II program of the European Union. The authors are grateful to K.M. Sefc and H. Steinkellner, Universität für Bodenkultur, Vienna, for prepublication access to their SSR markers, providing the software IDENTITY 1.0, and repeating part of this profiling work in a Pharmacia ALFExpress DNA sequencer for standardization purposes; to P.E. McGovern, Anthropology Museum Applied Science Center for Archaeology (MASCA), University of Pennsylvania, for personal communication; to K.J. Kyvelos, for laboratory assistance; and to M. Nikolantonakis, Institute of Floriculture, Horticulture and Viticulture, Katsabas, Heraklion, for access to the Institute’s ampelographic collection and for personal communications. The experiments of this study comply with the current laws of the Hellenic Republic.

Key words: Grapevine, Greece, nuclear microsatellites, SSR, Vitis vinifera




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. Heuertz, S. Goryslavets, J.-F. Hausman, and V. Risovanna
Characterization of Grapevine Accessions from Ukraine Using Microsatellite Markers
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 169 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
P. Boccacci, D. T. Marinoni, G. Gambino, R. Botta, and A. Schneider
Genetic Characterization of Endangered Grape Cultivars of Reggio Emilia Province
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2005; 56(4): 411 - 416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.