AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:4:325-334 (2004)
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Guinard, J.-X.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Guinard, J.-X.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Chapman, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Guinard, J.-X.

Sensory Attributes of Cabernet Sauvignon Wines Made from Vines with Different Crop Yields

Dawn M. Chapman 1, Mark A. Matthews 2, and Jean-Xavier Guinard 3

1 Department of Food Science and TechnologyNational Food Laboratory, 6363 Clark Ave., Dublin, CA 94568.
2 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616.
3 Department of Food Science and Technology

Email: jxguinard{at}ucdavis.edu

Crop yield is widely recognized as an important factor in the quality of resultant wines, but most prior research has shown no effect of yield on wine quality. The role of yield in the sensory properties of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Cabernet Sauvignon was tested using pruning and cluster thinning to manipulate yield. Cabernet Sauvignon vines in the Napa Valley were subjected to six winter pruning treatments over two vintages and eight cluster-thinning treatments over one vintage, with thinning imposed at veraison. The treatments created yields that varied from 4.3 to 22.2 t/ha. Descriptive analysis conducted on the resulting wines demonstrated significant differences in several sensory attributes. Analysis of variance and principal component analysis showed that the wines made from vines pruned to low bud numbers (hence "low yield") were higher in veggie aroma and flavor, bell pepper aroma, bitterness, and astringency than "high-yield" wines. Conversely, the wines made from vines pruned to high bud numbers were higher in red/black berry aroma, jam aroma, fresh fruit aroma, and fruity flavor than low-yield wines. Regression analysis showed that, in general, veggie attributes decreased in intensity and fruity attributes increased in intensity as bud number and yield increased. In contrast, there were few sensory differences detected in wines made from the various cluster-thinning treatments, although the yield range was greater in that experiment than in the pruning experiment. We conclude that Cabernet Sauvignon aromas and flavors respond to yield manipulation, but do so significantly only when yield is altered early in fruit development.

Note:
Acknowledgments: This research was funded by grants from the American Vineyard Foundation and the Viticulture Consortium. The authors thank Jay Turnipseed and Brennen Leighton for technical assistance, David Lum and Erin Peffly for sensory lab assistance, and the judges who conducted the descriptive analysis.

Key words: sensory evaluation, pruning, cluster thinning, yield, canopy management




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
J. K. Myers, J. A. Wolpert, and G. S. Howell
Effect of Shoot Number on the Leaf Area and Crop Weight Relationship of Young Sangiovese Grapevines
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2008; 59(4): 422 - 424.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. Keller, R. P. Smithyman, and L. J. Mills
Interactive Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Crop Load on Cabernet Sauvignon in an Arid Climate
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2008; 59(3): 221 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
L. D. Preston, D. E. Block, H. Heymann, G. Soleas, A. C. Noble, and S. E. Ebeler
Defining Vegetal Aromas in Cabernet Sauvignon Using Sensory and Chemical Evaluations
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 137 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
A. G. Reynolds, J. Schlosser, R. Power, R. Roberts, J. Willwerth, and C. de Savigny
Magnitude and Interaction of Viticultural and Enological Effects. I. Impact of Canopy Management and Yeast Strain on Sensory and Chemical Composition of Chardonnay Musque
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2007; 58(1): 12 - 24.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
M. O. Downey, N. K. Dokoozlian, and M. P. Krstic
Cultural Practice and Environmental Impacts on the Flavonoid Composition of Grapes and Wine: A Review of Recent Research
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2006; 57(3): 257 - 268.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
V. Nuzzo and M. A. Matthews
Response of Fruit Growth and Ripening to Crop Level in Dry-Farmed Cabernet Sauvignon on Four Rootstocks
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2006; 57(3): 314 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.