AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:4:363-370 (2004)
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kontkanen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kontkanen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kontkanen, D.
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A.

Effect of Yeast Inoculation Rate, Acclimatization, and Nutrient Addition on Icewine Fermentation

Derek Kontkanen 1, Debra L. Inglis 1, Gary J. Pickering 1, and Andrew Reynolds 2

1 Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Department of Biological Sciences
2 Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Department of Biological SciencesDepartment of Chemistry, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Ave., St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1 Canada.

email: dinglis{at}brocku.ca

Fermentations of highly concentrated icewine juice (35 to 42 Brix) are often sluggish, taking months to reach the desired ethanol level, and usually have high levels of volatile acidity. Two yeast inoculum levels using commercially available strain K1-V1116 were investigated in sterile-filtered icewine juice: 0.2 g of active dried wine yeast/L and 0.5 g of active dried wine yeast/L. The fermentation kinetics of inoculating these levels directly into icewine juice after yeast rehydration, or conditioning these cells to the concentrated juice using a stepwise acclimatization procedure after rehydration before inoculation, were compared. The effect of adding a yeast micronutrient supplement during yeast rehydration was also assessed. Yeast inoculated at 0.2 g/L stopped fermenting before the required ethanol level was achieved regardless of the inoculation procedure, producing only 62.2 g/L (7.8% v/v) and 64.4 g/L (8.1% v/v) ethanol for the direct and stepwise acclimatized inoculations, respectively. At 0.5 g/L, the stepwise acclimatized cells fermented the most sugar, producing 95.5 g/L (12.0% v/v) ethanol, whereas the direct inoculum produced 82.0 g/L (10.5% v/v) ethanol. The addition of the yeast nutrient during yeast rehydration increased the rate of biomass accumulation, reduced the fermentation time, reduced the ethanol concentration in the icewines, and reduced the rate of acetic acid produced as a function of sugar consumed. There was no difference in acetic acid concentration in the final wines across all treatments.

Note:
Acknowledgments: This project was funded by NSERC research grant 238872-01 and NSERC strategic grant 246424-01. We would like to thank Inniskillin Wines for providing the Vidal icewine juice and Lallemand for providing K1-V1116 and GO-FERM®.

Key words: icewine fermentation, ice wine, inoculation rate, sluggish fermentations, volatile acidity, acetic acid







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.