AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 55:4:379-388 (2004)
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rebucci, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Poni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rebucci, B.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Poni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Rebucci, B.

Performance of Croatina under Short-Cane Mechanical Hedging: A Successful Case of Adaptation

Stefano Poni 1, Fabio Bernizzoni 1, Pasquale Presutto 1, and Barbara Rebucci 2

1 Istituto di Frutti-viticoltura, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29100 Piacenza, Italy
2 CRPV, Filiera Viti-vinicola, Via Tebano 45, 48018, Faenza, Italy.

Email: stefano.poni{at}unicatt.it

The hypothesis that short mechanical hedging can be successfully applied even on cultivars with low fruitfulness of basal buds was tested over four years (2000 to 2003) on Vitis vinifera L. cv. Croatina. Yield per vine increased from 23 to 49% on hedged vines as compared to short-cane hand-pruned vines; up to a 30% increase (equivalent to sim60 nodes per vine) there was no detriment to grape quality, and labor demand was cut by 55 to 60%. Yield compensation in the hedged vines mostly occurred as reduced budbreak; weak or no compensation effects were seen for cluster weight and bud fruitfulness, respectively. A tendency for impaired quality was seen only at the highest node number per vine (sim75), while the linear relationship found between yield and node number per vine suggests that short-cane hand-pruning can also be feasible provided that at least 30 nodes per meter of row are retained. These findings indicate that mechanical pruning can be an excellent tool for converting traditionally long-cane pruned cultivars into short-cane pruned with related advantages in terms of more balanced growth and ripening and adaptability to full mechanization.

Note:
Acknowledgments: The authors thank Cesare Intrieri, University of Bologna, for critical reading of the manuscript, David Verzoni for editing and restyling the English text, and Giovanni Fugazza for lending the vineyard plots. This investigation was supported by a grant from CRPV, Filiera Viti-vinicola, Regione Emilia-Romagna, Italy.

Key words: winter pruning, bud fruitfulness, grape quality, labor requirements, yield compensation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
G. L. Main and J. R. Morris
Impact of Pruning Methods on Yield Components and Juice and Wine Composition of Cynthiana Grapes
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., June 1, 2008; 59(2): 179 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.