AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:1:19-29 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ingels, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Drenovsky, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ingels, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Drenovsky, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ingels, C. A.
Right arrow Articles by Drenovsky, R. E.

Effects of Cover Crops on Grapevines, Yield, Juice Composition, Soil Microbial Ecology, and Gopher Activity

Chuck A. Ingels1,*, Kate M. Scow2, Desley A. Whisson3 and Rebecca E. Drenovsky4

1 Viticulture Farm Advisor, University of California Cooperative Extension, 4145 Branch Center Rd., Sacramento, CA 95827; 2 Professor, 4 Post-doctoral Researcher, Land, Air & Water Resources Dept., 3 Wildlife Management Specialist, Wildlife, Fisheries and Conservation Biology Dept., University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

* Corresponding author [Tel: 916 875-6913; email: caingels{at}ucdavis.edu]

Several cover crop mixes were planted in a winegrape vineyard in Sacramento County to test their effects on vine growth, production, juice composition, soil microbial ecology, and gopher activity over a three-year period (1998 to 2000). The trial was conducted in a Vitis vinifera L. cv. Merlot vineyard on a silt loam soil. Vines were planted in 1993 on 5BB rootstock, spaced 2.1 x 3.4 m. The mixes used were: California native perennial grass (no-till), annual clover (no-till), green manure (disked), cereals (disked), and disked control. Cover crops were planted on either side of entire rows, with a disked alley separating treatment replicates. A 1.2-m herbicide strip was maintained under the vines. Drip irrigation and fertigation were applied uniformly across all treatments, but additional nitrogen fertilizer was applied to the grass mixes. Weed biomass increased in the clover mix but decreased in the native grass mix. Grapevine petiole nitrogen content was highest in the bell bean mix and very low in the native grass mix. There were very few differences in leaf water potential or pruning weights of the vines, and in yields or juice Brix, pH, or titratable acidity in any year. Cover-cropped soils had greater microbial biomass than disked or berm soils, and the no-till mixes had greater microbial biomass than the disked mixes. Gophers were very numerous in 1999 only, with nearly all activity exclusively in the clover mix.

Key words: cover crops, weed suppression, pocket gophers, soil microbial ecology




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
D. Tesic, M. Keller, and R. J. Hutton
Influence of Vineyard Floor Management Practices on Grapevine Vegetative Growth, Yield, and Fruit Composition
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2007; 58(1): 1 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.