AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 56:1:9-18 (2005)
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sivilotti, P.
Right arrow Articles by Peterlunger, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sivilotti, P.
Right arrow Articles by Peterlunger, E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sivilotti, P.
Right arrow Articles by Peterlunger, E.

Effect of Soil Moisture Availability on Merlot: From Leaf Water Potential to Grape Composition

Paolo Sivilotti, Christian Bonetto, Mariano Paladin and Enrico Peterlunger*

Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali, Università di Udine, Via delle Scienze 208, I-33100, Udine, Italy.

* Corresponding author [Fax: +39 0432 558603; email: peterlunger{at}uniud.it]

Grape phenolics are a relevant part of grape quality, and their metabolism in the berry may be modified by environmental factors. To determine the influence of different water regimes on the polyphenolic composition of berries, research was conducted for two years (2000 and 2001) on three-year-old Vitis vinifera cv. Merlot potted vines, comparing three water supply levels: (1) control (C), at ~80% of available water (aw); (2) moderate stress (M), at ~30% aw; and (3) severe stress (S), at ~15% aw. The treatments were applied in both years from veraison to fruit maturity. Predawn leaf water potential was reduced only in the S treatment in 2000, while in 2001 both M and S treatments had a lower value. Berry weight was reduced in M and S treatments, but no differences were observed in sugars, pH, and berry titratable acidity. Total skin and seed polyphenols were increased in S vines, but a probable increase of the structural complexity of phenolic compounds inside the berry (higher degree of polymerization) caused a lower extractability in winelike solution. Anthocyanins, which are monomers, were more concentrated and also more extracted in S berries. Water-stressed Merlot grapes (both S and M) will benefit from a longer maceration because a higher concentration of polymerized polyphenols could be extracted, stabilizing color and improving the mouthfeel properties of the resulting wines.

Key words: Vitis vinifera, water stress, plant physiology, phenolics

Abbreviations: {Psi}PD, predawn leaf water potential; A, net photosynthesis; aw, available water; C, control; ci, intercellular CO2 concentration; E, transpiration; EtOH, ethanol 12% solution; gs, stomatal conductance; M, moderate stress; MeOH, methanol-HCl solution; S, severe stress; TB, tartaric buffer







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.