HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sánchez, L. A. Articles by Dokoozlian, N. K. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sánchez, L. A. Articles by Dokoozlian, N. K. Agricola Articles by Sánchez, L. A. Articles by Dokoozlian, N. K.

Bud Microclimate and Fruitfulness in Vitis vinifera L.

¹ Formerly Graduate student and ² Extension viticulturist, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; present address: E. & J. Gallo Winery, P.O. Box 1130, Modesto, CA 95353.

^* Corresponding author [Email: luis.sanchez{at}ejgallo.com]

The effect of light on bud fruitfulness of Thompson Seedless (TS), Flame Seedless (FS), Chardonnay (CH), and Cabernet Sauvignon (CS) was studied under field conditions in the San Joaquin Valley of California. Light and temperature effects were also assessed in growth chambers on TS and FS. In field vines, discrete shoot light exposure levels were established by pruning and shoot positioning. Bud light interception was measured weekly from April through August and continuously during seven days at the end of April. Potential fruitfulness was assessed during dormancy by bud dissections. Observed fruitfulness was assessed visually three weeks after budbreak. Shoot light exposure had a significant effect on potential fruitfulness of all cultivars and on observed fruitfulness of TS and FS. The most fruitful cultivar was CH, followed by CS, FS, and TS. Maximum potential fruitfulness in TS and CS occurred at approximately one-third of full sunlight, whereas in CH and FS fruitfulness continued to increase with irradiance. Fruitfulness in TS and FS was not affected by bud orientation or location within the canopy. Midday light interception by individual buds did not correlate with their particular fruitfulness. However, when data from individual buds was pooled by shoot, shoot light microclimate significantly correlated with potential fruitfulness. Maximum fruitfulness in TS and FS under controlled conditions occurred at 25°C but was drastically reduced at 32°C in TS and at 18°C in FS. Again, there was no relation between individual bud light exposure and fruitfulness.

Key words: vine fruitfulness, yield components

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. L. Hostetler, I. A. Merwin, M. G. Brown, and O. Padilla-Zakour Influence of Geotextile Mulches on Canopy Microclimate, Yield, and Fruit Composition of Cabernet franc Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2007; 58(4): 431 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Costantini, L. Landi, O. Silvestroni, T. Pandolfini, A. Spena, and B. Mezzetti Auxin Synthesis-Encoding Transgene Enhances Grape Fecundity Plant Physiology, April 1, 2007; 143(4): 1689 - 1694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]