HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reeve, J. R. Articles by McCloskey, L. P. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Reeve, J. R. Articles by McCloskey, L. P. Agricola Articles by Reeve, J. R. Articles by McCloskey, L. P.

Soil and Winegrape Quality in Biodynamically and Organically Managed Vineyards

¹ Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164; ² Wholistic Estate Management, PO Box 760, Hopland, CA 95482; ³ University of California Cooperative Extension, 579 Low Gap Road, Ukiah, CA 95482; and ⁴ Enologix, 461 Seventh St. W., #1, Sonoma, CA 95476.

^* Corresponding author [Email: jrreeve{at}wsu.edu]

Wines produced from biodynamically grown grapes have received increasing attention. Similar to organic agriculture, biodynamics eliminates synthetic chemical fertilizers and pesticides. The primary difference between the two farming systems is that biodynamics uses a series of soil and plant amendments, called preparations, said to stimulate the soil and enhance plant health and quality of produce. Whether these preparations actually augment soil or winegrape quality is unclear and controversial. A long-term, replicated, 4.9-ha study was initiated in 1996 on a commercial Merlot vineyard near Ukiah, California, to investigate the effects of these biodynamic preparations on soil and winegrape quality. The study consisted of two treatments, biodynamic and organic (the control), each replicated four times in a randomized, complete block design. All management practices were the same in all plots, except for the addition of the preparations to the biodynamic treatment. No differences were found in soil quality in the first six years. Nutrient analyses of leaf tissue, clusters per vine, yield per vine, cluster weight, and berry weight showed no differences. Although average pruning weights for both treatments in 2001 to 2003 fell within the optimal range of 0.3 to 0.6 kg/m for producing high-quality winegrapes, ratios of yield to pruning weight were significantly different (p < 0.05) and indicated that the biodynamic treatment had ideal vine balance for producing high-quality winegrapes but that the control vines were slightly overcropped. Biodynamically treated winegrapes had significantly higher (p < 0.05) Brix and notably higher (p < 0.1) total phenols and total anthocyanins in 2003. Biodynamic preparations may affect winegrape canopy and chemistry but were not shown to affect the soil parameters or tissue nutrients measured in this study.

Key words: biodynamic viticulture, organic farming, soil quality, winegrape quality

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Fragoulis, M. Trevisan, A. Di Guardo, A. Sorce, M. van der Meer, F. Weibel, and E. Capri Development of a Management Tool to Indicate the Environmental Impact of Organic Viticulture J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2009; 38(2): 826 - 835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]