|
|
||||||||
1 Ph.D. student, now lecturer in Viticulture, 2 Senior lecturer in Plant Science, and 3 Senior lecturer in Viticulture, Center for Viticulture and Oenology, Lincoln University, PO Box 84, Canterbury, 8150 New Zealand; 4 Lead scientist, Marlborough Wine Research Center, PO Box 845, Blenheim, New Zealand.
* Corresponding author [Email: creasyg{at}lincoln.ac.nz; fax: +64 3 325 3851]
The carbohydrate (CHO) reserve physiology of Chardonnay grapevines growing in the cool climate of New Zealand was examined in relation to subsequent flowering and fruiting using defoliation treatments. Vines were defoliated by removing all but the four basal leaves from shoots at monthly intervals starting at four weeks postbloom. Throughout the following season, CHO reserves in the roots and trunks were measured and detailed assessments of vine flowering and yields were recorded. Previous seasons vine defoliation decreased concentrations of overwintering CHO reserves (mostly starch) in both roots and trunks, with earlier defoliation times resulting in the largest reductions. Roots were most sensitive, with early defoliation reducing starch concentrations at budburst to 1.5% DW compared with 17% DW in non-defoliated vines. Reductions in root and trunk CHO reserves were closely associated with significant decreases in inflorescence number per shoot and flower number per inflorescence (up to 50% less than in control vines). Differences in CHO concentrations in both the root and trunk were maintained to veraison, but at flowering had no effect on the percent fruit set in the first season after defoliation. Therefore, lower yields in the following season were caused by fewer inflorescences per shoot and flowers per inflorescence. Shoot growth and total vine pruning weight were also decreased in vines where CHO reserves were reduced. These findings suggest that restricted CHO reserve accumulation as a consequence of defoliation may have a negative impact on subsequent grapevine flowering and productivity, particularly so in a cool-climate environment where there is no postharvest CHO reserve accumulation period.
Key words: carbohydrate reserves, starch, defoliation, flowers, fruit set
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. L. Hammons, S. K. Kurtural, and D. A. Potter Japanese Beetle Defoliation Reduces Primary Bud Cold Hardiness during Vineyard Establishment Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2010; 61(1): 130 - 134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Vasconcelos, M. Greven, C. S. Winefield, M. C.T. Trought, and V. Raw The Flowering Process of Vitis vinifera: A Review Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2009; 60(4): 411 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Smith and B. P. Holzapfel Cumulative Responses of Semillon Grapevines to Late Season Perturbation of Carbohydrate Reserve Status Am. J. Enol. Vitic., December 1, 2009; 60(4): 461 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Bavaresco, M. Gatti, S. Pezzutto, M. Fregoni, and F. Mattivi Effect of Leaf Removal on Grape Yield, Berry Composition, and Stilbene Concentration Am. J. Enol. Vitic., September 1, 2008; 59(3): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Lebon, G. Wojnarowiez, B. Holzapfel, F. Fontaine, N. Vaillant-Gaveau, and C. Clement Sugars and flowering in the grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) J. Exp. Bot., July 1, 2008; 59(10): 2565 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Weber, F. P. Trouillas, and W. D. Gubler Double Pruning of Grapevines: A Cultural Practice to Reduce Infections by Eutypa lata Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2007; 58(1): 61 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |