AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 57:1:89-104 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smart, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morano, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Smart, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morano, L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Smart, D. R.
Right arrow Articles by Morano, L.

Grapevine Rooting Patterns: A Comprehensive Analysis and a Review

David R. Smart1,*, Erin Schwass1, Alan Lakso2 and Lisa Morano3

1 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA 95616; 2 Department of Horticultural Sciences, New York State Agricultural Experiment Station, Cornell University, Geneva, NY 14456; 3 Department of Natural Sciences, University of Houston, Downtown, Houston, TX 77002.

* Corresponding author [fax: 530-752-0382; email: drsmart{at}ucdavis.edu]

Grapevines are grown either on their own roots or on rootstocks that represent a mixture of grapevine species and hybrids. Developmental and physiological factors other than phylloxera resistance, lime tolerance, and ease of propagation were not directly considered during rootstock breeding, including rooting patterns. Here, in a comprehensive literature synthesis, we have compiled information concerning rooting depth distributions of grapevine roots from wall profile studies comprising a broad range of soil environments and rootstock genotypes. We considered the distributions based on the asymptotic equation of Y = (1 – ßd), where d = soil depth (cm) and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to depth d. The median value of ß for the root distributions analyzed was 0.9826 and the standard deviation over all observations was 0.0068 (n = 240); most profiles had fitted values of ß generally greater than 0.975. This value places the depth distribution of grapevine roots in the vadose zone among the deepest observed for plants worldwide. The data suggested that soil properties such as the presence of soil profiles impermeable to root penetration, stoniness, and presence of gravel lenses have a greater influence on depth distributions than does genotype, even in deep fertile soils. Genotypic differences were not apparent, although the rootstock O39-16 (ß = 0.9867 ± 0.0009, mean ± se, n = 11), with a reputation for deep-rooting behavior, did exhibit deeper root distributions. The analysis also suggests that root characteristics other than root horizontal and vertical spread may need to be considered in order to explain some key rootstock characteristics like scion vigor or drought tolerance.

Key words: grapevine rootstocks, root distribution, rooting depth, vineyard soil







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.