AJEV AJEV Best Papers - Free Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 57:3:314-324 (2006)
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nuzzo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nuzzo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, M. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Nuzzo, V.
Right arrow Articles by Matthews, M. A.

Response of Fruit Growth and Ripening to Crop Level in Dry-Farmed Cabernet Sauvignon on Four Rootstocks

Vitale Nuzzo1,* and Mark A. Matthews2

1 Assistant professor, Universita’ degli Studi della Basilicata, Dipartimento di Scienze dei Sistemi Colturali, Forestali e dell’Ambiente, V. le Dell’Ateneo Lucano, 10, 85100 Potenza, Italy; 2 Professor, Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

* Corresponding author [fax: 39 (0) 971 20 5378; email: nuzzo{at}unibas.it]

An estimate of the amount of clusters that a vine can reasonably bring to maturity is essential for optimizing crop level. This work was conducted to determine whether the timing of maturity in a high-yielding, dry-farmed Vitis vinifera L. Cabernet Sauvignon vineyard could be manipulated through rootstocks and crop level. Cabernet Sauvignon, grafted on 5C Teleki (V. berlandieri Planch. x V. riparia Michx), 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, and 110 Richter (V. berlandieri Planch. x V. rupestris Scheele), was used in a trial carried out in 1997 and 1998 in an 8-year-old vineyard near Oakville, California. Four levels of crop were imposed by winter pruning all vines to four-bud spurs and cluster thinning at veraison: treatment 1 (100%), or double crop, no thinned vines with ~26 shoots and 40 clusters per vine; treatment 2 (75%), in which 25% of clusters were thinned; treatment 3 (50%), the standard crop level in the study area or control, in which 50% of clusters were thinned and one cluster per shoot was retained; and treatment 4 (25%), in which 75% of clusters were thinned and one cluster every two shoots was retained. The time required to reach 23.5, 24.0, and 25.0 Brix was linearly dependent on crop level with a rate of about one day per each ton of grapes. Rootstocks and crop levels had no or little impact on fruitfulness, cluster and berry size, and final Brix. The reduction in sugar accumulation seems to be a sensitive measure for crop level and does not appear to be influenced by rootstock or environmental conditions.

Key words: berry growth, berry composition, yield, 1103 Paulsen, 140 Ruggeri, 110 Richter, 5C Teleki







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.