AJEV AJEV Best Papers - Free Access
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 58:2:145-162 (2007)
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Savigny, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Savigny, C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Reynolds, A. G.
Right arrow Articles by de Savigny, C.

Use of GPS and GIS for Elucidation of the Basis for Terroir: Spatial Variation in an Ontario Riesling Vineyard

Andrew G. Reynolds1,*, Ilya V. Senchuk2, Conor van der Reest2 and Christiane de Savigny3

1 Professor of viticulture, 2 Undergraduate thesis student, and 3 Technician, Cool Climate Oenology and Viticulture Institute, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.

* Corresponding author (fax: 905-688-3104; email: areynold{at}brocku.ca)

Vine size and soil texture effects on yield components, soil, vine tissue, fruit composition, and wine sensory attributes were measured in an Ontario Riesling vineyard to clarify the potential basis for terroir. Sentinel (sample) vines were geolocated using global positioning systems. Geographic information systems delineated spatial variation in soil texture and soil vine tissue composition (1998) and in yield components, berry composition, and weight of cane prunings (vine size) over four years (1998 to 2002) from each sentinel vine. Vines were classified as large or small based on previous season vine size within each of two soil texture classes (clay and sand); fruit from these four categories was separated for winemaking; berry, must, and wine chemical compositional data were determined; and wine sensory descriptive analysis was conduced. Correlations were observed between soil texture and composition versus berry weight and potentially volatile terpenes (PVT). There were no consistent soil texture or vine size effects on berry, must, or wine composition. Large vine size increased berry titratable acidity (TA) (2001) and PVT (2002), decreased must pH (1999), and increased wine free volatile terpenes (2001). Sandy soil reduced wine TA and must PVT (1999) and increased berry TA and must soluble solids (2002). Vine size and soil texture did not consistently affect wine sensory attributes across vintages. High vine vigor decreased mineral aroma (1999) and citrus flavor (2001) and increased apple attributes (2001). Clay soil increased mineral aroma (1999 and 2001) and citrus attributes (1999) but decreased apple aroma (1999). Citrus aroma and petrol flavor increased in some vine size x soil texture combinations in 2002. Vintage and wine age had greater impacts on wine sensory attributes than vine size or soil texture.

Key words: fruit composition, global positioning systems, geographic information systems, precision viticulture, sensory analysis







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.