AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 59:1:1-10 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cortell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heymann, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cortell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heymann, H.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Cortell, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Heymann, H.

Influence of Vine Vigor on Pinot noir Fruit Composition, Wine Chemical Analysis, and Wine Sensory Attributes

Jessica M. Cortell1, Hanne K. Sivertsen2, James A. Kennedy1 and Hildegarde Heymann2,*

1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; 2 Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

* Corresponding author (fax: 530 752-0382; email: hheymann{at}ucdavis.edu)

The relationships among grapevine (Vitis vinifera) vigor variation and resulting fruit composition, fruit chemical analyses, wine chemical analyses, and sensory attributes were investigated. The study was conducted in a commercial vineyard consisting of the same clone, rootstock, age, and vineyard management practices. In 2003, vine vigor parameters were used to designate vigor zones within two vineyard sites to produce research wines. Similar winemaking practices were used. Descriptive sensory analysis and partial least squares (PLS) modeling was done on two-year-old wines. Wines and model extracts were analyzed by HPLC. Significant sensory attributes included earthy, chemical, heat, sweet, sour, bitter, and astringent. Astringency was the most important attribute used to differentiate the wines. Low vigor wines had much higher astringency than high vigor wines. Positively correlated variables included number of seeds per berry, fruit total tannin (mg/kg), and skin tannin (mg/kg), while total flavan-3-ol monomers per seed, total flavan-3-ol monomers per berry, fruit TA, and berry weight were negatively correlated with the sensory attributes. Interestingly, seed tannin was not an important variable in the model. There was a strong relationship between fruit total tannin and wine astringency, which was related to differences in skin rather than seed-derived tannin. There was a strong relationship between measured and predicted astringency.

Key words: astringency, tannins, seeds, skin







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.