AJEV Link to 2009 Best Vit Paper
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 59:1:22-29 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Guidoni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Novello, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Guidoni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Novello, V.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Guidoni, S.
Right arrow Articles by Novello, V.

Effects of Seasonal and Agronomical Practices on Skin Anthocyanin Profile of Nebbiolo Grapes

Silvia Guidoni1, Alessandra Ferrandino1 and Vittorino Novello1,*

1 Dipartimento Colture Arboree, Università di Torino, Via Leonardo da Vinci 44, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy.

* Corresponding author (fax: +39-011-2368758; email: vittorino.novello{at}unito.it)

The influence of season and 50% cluster thinning (CT) and 50% leaf removal (LR) on skin anthocyanin profile was studied in cv. Nebbiolo in the Barbaresco wine production area (northwestern Italy). Climatic conditions over two years strongly interacted with treatments: 2000 was hot and rainy; 2001 was cooler and very dry. The leaf area/yield ratio value was higher in 2000 in response to good water availability, and it was optimal only in 2000 LR vines and in 2001 CT vines, which displayed the highest total soluble solid content at harvest. In comparison with control vines, anthocyanin concentration increased only in 2000 CT vines, even if final concentration was not significantly higher, because of its reduction before harvest. The 2001 drought reduced vine vegetative development, sugar production (–8.3%), and total anthocyanin concentration (–20.7%) in respect to 2000. Individual anthocyanin concentration varied as a consequence of chemical structure, canopy management practices, and seasonal climatic conditions. Thus, the peonidin-3-glucoside/malvidin-3-glucoside ratio varied on average from 1.9 in 2000 to 1.2 in 2001, and it was higher in treated vines than in control vines. Anthocyanin accumulation can be divided into two distinct phases: an initial phase of rapid increase influenced primarily by vine vegetative conditions and secondarily by cultural practices and a second "finishing" phase during which climatic conditions played a fundamental role. 3'-Substituted anthocyanin biosynthesis is likely more strongly influenced by climatic conditions and cultural practices than is 3',5'-substituted anthocyanin biosynthesis.

Key words: Vitis vinifera L., leaf removal, cluster thinning, total anthocyanins, peonidin-3-glucoside/malvidin-3-glucoside ratio




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
L. Rolle, F. Torchio, G. Zeppa, and V. Gerbi
Relationship between Skin Break Force and Anthocyanin Extractability at Different Ripening Stages
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2009; 60(1): 93 - 97.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.