AJEV Link to 2009 Best Vit Paper
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 59:4:412-417 (2008)
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tardaguila, J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez de Toda, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Tardaguila, J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez de Toda, F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Tardaguila, J.
Right arrow Articles by Martinez de Toda, F.

Research Note

Effects of Mechanical Thinning on Yield and Fruit Composition of Tempranillo and Grenache Grapes Trained to a Vertical Shoot-Positioned Canopy

Javier Tardaguila1,*, Paul R. Petrie2, Stefano Poni3, Maria P. Diago4 and Fernando Martinez de Toda5

1 Associate professor of viticulture, 4 Viticulture researcher, 5 Professor of viticulture, Department of Agriculture, University of La Rioja, 26006, Logroño, Spain; 2 Viticulturist, Foster’s Group Ltd., P.O. Box 96, Magill, SA 5072, Australia; and 3 Professor of viticulture, Istituto di Frutti-Viticoltura, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29100 Piacenza, Italy.

* Corresponding author (email: javier.tardaguila{at}unirioja.es; fax: +34 941 299720)

The impact of mechanical thinning using a machine harvester on yield components and fruit composition of Tempranillo and Grenache (Vitis vinifera L.) vines was investigated. Experiments were conducted in two Spanish vineyards, both trained to a vertical shoot-positioned canopy over two consecutive seasons. The height of the harvester and the position of the bow rods were adjusted so that fruit was removed by the vibration of the canopy caused by the bow rods striking the vine trunks. The Tempranillo was thinned ~10 days before veraison and the Grenache was thinned when 10 to 15% of berries were colored. Mechanical thinning significantly reduced berry number per cluster, cluster weight, and cluster compactness; a similar amount of fruit (~65%) was removed from both varieties. Botrytis incidence was reduced by mechanical thinning of the Grenache in 2007 and was otherwise not affected by thinning treatments. Soluble solid concentration was higher under mechanical thinning treatments over the two seasons in Tempranillo and in 2006 in Grenache, suggesting that damage to the canopy was minimal. Phenolic concentration (both berry and berry fresh weight basis) was higher in fruit from the mechanically thinned vines compared with the control (unthinned) in Tempranillo in 2007 and only on a per berry basis in Grenache in 2006. Mechanical thinning conducted with a machine harvester has the potential to be a cost-effective technique to regulate yield in vineyards with vertical shoot-positioned canopies.

Key words: Tempranillo, Grenache, Vitis vinifera, mechanical thinning, crop regulation, grape composition




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
T. Preszler, T. M. Schmit, and J. E. Vanden Heuvel
A Model to Establish Economically Sustainable Cluster-Thinning Practices
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2010; 61(1): 140 - 146.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.