AJEV
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 60:4:497-507 (2009)
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Úrbez-Torres, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gubler, W. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Úrbez-Torres, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gubler, W. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Úrbez-Torres, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Gubler, W. D.

Identification, Incidence, and Pathogenicity of Fungal Species Associated with Grapevine Dieback in Texas

José Ramón Úrbez-Torres1, Penny Adams2, Jim Kamas3 and Walter Douglas Gubler4,*

1 Ph.D. candidate, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616; 2 Extension viticulture associate, Texas AgriLife Extension, Texas A&M University System, Fredericksburg, TX 78624; 3 Assistant professor and extension fruit specialist, Department of Horticultural Sciences, Texas AgriLife Extension, Texas A&M University System, Fredericksburg, TX 78624; and 4 Extension specialist, Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616.

Acknowledgments: The authors gratefully acknowledge A.M.C. Schilder and S.A. Jordan (Department of Plant Pathology, Michigan State University) for providing Eutypella vitis reference isolates for this study.

* Corresponding author (email: wdgubler{at}ucdavis.edu)

Grapevine cankers and consequent dieback have been commonly observed in Texas vineyards. However, identity of the grapevine canker-causing agents in Texas has not been reported. Between 2007 and 2009, diseased grapevine samples showing perennial cankers from 45 vineyards in Texas were collected and inspected for fungal identification. Eleven fungal species—Lasiodiplodia theobromae, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Neofusicoccum parvum, Diplodia seriata, Diplodia corticola, Phomopsis viticola, Eutypella vitis, Diatrypella sp., Truncatella sp., Pestalotiopsis uvicola, and Pestalotiopsis sp.—were isolated from grapevine cankers and identified based on morphological characteristics and analyses of nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS1-5.8S-ITS2). Botryosphaeriaceae spp. were the most common fungi isolated from grapevine dieback in Texas followed by Pestalotiopsis spp., P. viticola, and Diatrypaceae spp. Pathogenicity of all species was verified by inoculation of excised mature lignified dormant canes of Redglobe and Cabernet Sauvignon grapevines under controlled laboratory conditions. Isolates of L. theobromae and N. parvum were the most virulent based on the length of vascular necrosis in the wood and percentage of fungal re-isolation. Phomopsis viticola isolates followed in virulence to L. theobromae and N. parvum and were shown to be capable of colonizing mature wood and cause vascular necrosis and cankers. The diatrypaceous fungi E. vitis and Diatrypella sp. were the least virulent to grapevines among all fungi tested. All these fungal species represent newly recorded fungal pathogens of grapevines in Texas. Moreover, the association of D. corticola with grapevines is reported.

Key words: canker, grapevine dieback, trunk diseases, Vitis vinifera




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Enol. Vitic.Home page
P. E. Rolshausen, J. R. Urbez-Torres, S. Rooney-Latham, A. Eskalen, R. J. Smith, and W. D. Gubler
Evaluation of Pruning Wound Susceptibility and Protection Against Fungi Associated with Grapevine Trunk Diseases
Am. J. Enol. Vitic., March 1, 2010; 61(1): 113 - 119.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture.