Abstract
Dry white table wines were made from Chardonnay, Chenin blanc, French Colombard, and Semillon grapes following 0, 3, 6 and 12 hours holding of the destemmed, crushed grapes before juice separation and with additions at crushing of zero, low (50 mg/L), intermediate (100 mg/L) and high (200 mg/L) levels of SO2. A fifth series, making 20 wines per variety, had zero added SO2 and was bubbled with oxygen gas throughout holding.
These oxygenated musts browned severely, but when finished the wines tended to be slightly less brown, more resistant to further browning, less fruity, and lower in general quality than the comparable (zero SO2) nonoxygenated wines. Deliberate oxidation of musts is concluded to be undesirable, even though it was possible to decrease the phenolic browning substrate in the wine by this procedure.
Added SO2 was bound during fermentation, of course, and the free SO2 in the wine was nearly the same whether SO2 had been added or not. Furthermore, during pomace contact the total SO2 was rapidly lowered. Increased pomace contact and increased SO2 increased extraction of total phenol, specifically the flavonoid fraction, from the pomace into the wine and increased absorbance at 280 and 320 nm by the wines. Absorbance at 420 nm and the capacity to brown further were directly related to pomace contact and inversely to added SO2. Increased pomace contact increased the wines' pinking upon exposure to oxygen and low levels of added SO2 encouraged, while high levels discouraged, such pinking. Astringency or bitterness differences were not large or consistent enough to be meaningful except for increased bitterness at the highest level of pomace contact. Fruitiness and general quality were affected similarly, being improved by low to intermediate levels of SO2 addition to the must and generally harmed by appreciable pomace contact. However, the optimum pomace contact appeared to be zero only for Chenin blanc and increased for the others in the order French Colombard, Chardonnay, and Semillon.
- Received June 1979.
- Revision received August 1979.
- Accepted August 1979.
- Published online January 1980
- Copyright 1980 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Sign in for ASEV members
ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.
Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.