Abstract
Cabernet Sauvignon vines in one Napa Valley and two Davis, California vineyards were differentially pruned to investigate the problem of bud failure or weak shoots on basal and mid-cane segments. Treatments were: (T1) nine 4-node spurs, (T2) four 8-node canes, (T3) two 15-node canes, (T4) four 17-node canes with 50% fruit thinned at véraison, and (T5) two arched canes draped over the foliage wire. Data from a separate plot of cordon-trained vines with twenty 2-node spurs were included for comparison. Bud failure was reduced for treatments with shorter bearing units and for arched canes. Distribution of fruit and vigor of mid-cane shoots were improved by arching canes. Although over half the clusters on cordon-trained vines came from noncount buds (spur base buds and latent buds), these clusters were considerably smaller than clusters on shoots from spurs. The major contribution of crop, therefore, was from count buds. Differences due to vineyard site outweighed any differences due to pruning. Primary and second crop and fruit composition were affected by pruning method. Arching canes is a worthwhile practice when cane pruning Cabernet Sauvignon vines. Training Cabernet Sauvignon to cordons appears to be a most effective system.
- Received June 1982.
- Copyright 1983 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Sign in for ASEV members
ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.
Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.