Abstract
Grapevines are grown either on their own roots or on rootstocks that represent a mixture of grapevine species and hybrids. Developmental and physiological factors other than phylloxera resistance, lime tolerance, and ease of propagation were not directly considered during rootstock breeding, including rooting patterns. Here, in a comprehensive literature synthesis, we have compiled information concerning rooting depth distributions of grapevine roots from wall profile studies comprising a broad range of soil environments and rootstock genotypes. We considered the distributions based on the asymptotic equation of Y = (1 − ßd), where d = soil depth (cm) and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to depth d. The median value of ß for the root distributions analyzed was 0.9826 and the standard deviation over all observations was 0.0068 (n = 240); most profiles had fitted values of ß generally greater than 0.975. This value places the depth distribution of grapevine roots in the vadose zone among the deepest observed for plants worldwide. The data suggested that soil properties such as the presence of soil profiles impermeable to root penetration, stoniness, and presence of gravel lenses have a greater influence on depth distributions than does genotype, even in deep fertile soils. Genotypic differences were not apparent, although the rootstock O39-16 (ß = 0.9867 ± 0.0009, mean ± se, n = 11), with a reputation for deep-rooting behavior, did exhibit deeper root distributions. The analysis also suggests that root characteristics other than root horizontal and vertical spread may need to be considered in order to explain some key rootstock characteristics like scion vigor or drought tolerance.
Footnotes
Acknowledgments: Support from The American Viticulture Foundation and the USDA/CSREES Special Research Grants Program 2001-34360-10328 and 2003-34360-13177 is gratefully acknowledged. The root mapping data in New York was obtained from unpublished maps done in 1962-63 provided for retracing and further analyses to A. Lasko by Dr. Nelson Shaulis of Cornell University, now deceased. We thank Anna Vu and Christine Stockert for technical assistance. David M. Eissenstat, Kerri L. Steenwerth, and M. Andrew Walker made many helpful comments that greatly improved both the scope and clarity of this manuscript.
This article was first published in the Proceedings of the Soil Environment and Vine Mineral Nutrition Symposium. L.P. Christensen and D.R. Smart (Eds.), pp. 153-169 (2005). American Society for Enology and Viticulture, Davis, CA.
From Proceedings of the Soil Environment and Vine Mineral Nutrition Symposium
- Copyright © 2006 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture