Abstract
Crop levels of 1 (low), 1.5 (medium), and 2 (high) clusters per shoot established by cluster thinning (CT) were compared to non-thinned (control) Riesling vines over a three year period. Yields ranged from 5.2 to 12.4 t/ha in 2008 and from 4.0 to 9.3 t/ha in 2009, while crop loads (yield/pruning weight) ranged from 2.9 to 8.7, and 2.9 to 9.9, respectively. By 2010, yield and crop load (yield/pruning weight) did not differ among treatments. Cluster weight was unaffected by CT in 2008 and 2009 but in 2010 control clusters weighed 39% less than low crop. There was little or no CT effect on berry size, pH, TA, pruning weight, cluster light exposure or bud cold hardiness. Soluble solids at harvest ranged from 18.2°Brixin control to 22.3 in low crop in 2008, from 18.9 to 22.1 Brix respectively in 2009, and from 20.5 to 22.0 respectively Brix in 2010. A consumer wine aroma sorting trial revealed that the low crop wine, and the low and medium crop wines, differed in aromatic attributes from the other treatments in 2008 and 2009, respectively. Grower financial net return per hectare ranged from $2,832 in low crop to $16,055 in control in 2008, from −$115 to $8,596 respectively in 2009 and from $1,938 to $4,242 respectively in 2010. The only way financial losses associated with CT could be recouped would be withincreases of up to 143% over base market price for grapes.
- ©2013 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Sign in for ASEV members
ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.
Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.