Abstract
Climate change will require grape-growers to develop improved viticultural practices to control vine yield, and the rate of fruit maturation. The impacts of five different canopy management regimens on vegetation, yield, and grape quality were investigated, as well as carryover effects upon vines in the following year. Winter pruning (Wp), shoot thinning (St), shoot thinning with pre-anthesis defoliation (St+Dpa), shoot thinning with pre-veraison defoliation (St+Dpv), and, lastly, shoot thinning with pre-veraison defoliation plus cluster thinning (St+Dpv+Ct) were applied to Sangiovese vines during 2011-2013. Neither St nor St+Dpv changed yield or grape quality compared to Wp. St+Dpa treatment did reduced leaf area and yield (−33%), compared to Wp and St, with an increase in sugar concentration and a carryover effect into 2014 reducing vine capacity. A management strategy that combines shoot thinning with pre-anthesis defoliation, increasing sugar concentration and suppressing yield, offers the grape-grower the most potential for long term regulation of vine yield and grape quality. However, in a non-irrigated vineyard of medium vigor, Wp, St and St+Dpv could be used to achieve yield and fruit quality levels according to desired or defined threshold, considering the relative cost of the vineyard practices.
- ©2016 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture
Sign in for ASEV members
ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.
Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers
Log in using your username and password
Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00
Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.