Elsevier

Journal of Chromatography A

Volume 1218, Issue 50, 16 December 2011, Pages 8975-8981
Journal of Chromatography A

Ultrasound-assisted emulsification–microextraction for the sensitive determination of Brett character responsible compounds in wines

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.10.012Get rights and content

Abstract

In this study, a method based on ultrasound-assisted emulsification–microextraction (USAEME) was optimised for the determination of Brett character responsible compounds (4-ethylguaiacol (EG), 4-ethylphenol (EP), 4-vinylguaiacol (VG) and 4-vinylphenol (VP)) in wines. For this purpose, once the extraction solvent had been selected, the influence on the extraction efficiency of ratio between extraction solvent and sample volumes, temperature, ionic strength and time was studied using experimental design methodology. The optimum conditions found for USAEME of 5 mL of wine were 160 μL of chlorobenzene at 60 °C during 5 min without salt addition. Then, the analytical performance of the optimised USAEME procedure was evaluated. For all the studied compounds, the proposed method showed correlation coefficients over 0.984. Satisfactory repeatability (below 10%) and inter-day repeatability (below 11%) were obtained at different concentration levels and the method achieved detection limits similar or even lower than previously reported for these compounds in wines. Moreover, the applicability of the method was evaluated by the analysis of real samples. To our knowledge, this is the first time that USAEME has been applied to the determination of Brett character responsible compounds in wine.

Highlights

USAEME has been applied to the determination of volatile phenols in wine. ► Experimental design allowed the determination of the optimal USAEME conditions. ► The proposed method achieves suitable detection limits, recoveries and precision.

Introduction

Food product quality is an issue of increasing importance for consumers. One of the key parameters in determining the quality of a wine is its aroma. The appearance of compounds which reduce the sensory quality of wine can cause serious economical losses to the enological industry. Bearing this in mind, studies focused on quality assurance are continually appearing with the development of new analytical techniques focused on the determination of compounds responsible for undesirable aroma in wine. Some of the most common compounds which may reduce wine quality are the volatile phenols, 4-ethylphenol (EP), 4-ethylguaiacol (EG), 4-vinylphenol (VP) and 4-vinylguaiacol (VG). These compounds are usually present in wine positively contributing to the wine aroma complexity. Vinylphenols appear in wines from the descarboxylation reaction of hydroxycinnamic acids produced by yeasts during fermentation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. In addition, the yeasts Brettanomyces/Dekkera may develop after fermentation performing the reduction of the vinylphenols to ethylphenols [6], [7], [8], [9]. High concentration of vinylphenols, whose occurrence is higher in white wines, gives the wine medicinal and spicy odours. On the other hand, ethylphenols are usually present in higher concentrations in red wines giving them phenolic and animal odours [8], [9], [10].

The determination of Brett character responsible compounds in wine is mostly accomplished by gas chromatography (GC). Due to the high complexity of the matrix, sample preparation is a key step in the analytical procedures previous to the determination. Traditionally, liquid–liquid extraction methods with organic solvents were employed for sample preparation for the determination of volatile phenols [11], [12], [13], [14]. However, with increasing concerns in miniaturisation and sample, solvent and time savings, new procedures such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) [15], [16], [17], solid-phase microextraction (SPME) [18], [19], [20], [21] and stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) [22], [23] have been developed.

In recent years, a new economical, simple and fast microextraction procedure, named dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME), has been satisfactorily applied to the determination of off-flavor responsible compounds in wines such as volatile phenols, haloanisoles and halophenols [24], [25], [26]. DLLME method consists in the rapid injection of an appropriate mixture of an extraction solvent and a disperser solvent into an aqueous sample, thus forming a cloudy solution in which the extraction solvent is dispersed throughout the sample [27]. However, the presence of the disperser solvent, necessary for the correct formation of the dispersion, can diminish the partition coefficient of analytes between the sample and the extraction solvent [28]. Taking this into account, a new approach in this technique, which uses ultrasonic radiation to achieve the dispersion, has been recently proposed [29].

The application of ultrasounds in liquids produces cavitation phenomena, that is, the formation of microbubbles that finally collapse [30], [31]. When the liquid is a mixture of two immiscible phases the result of the cavitation and collapse is an emulsion of the minority phase in the bulk. The cavitational collapse also produces strong variations of pressure and temperature in the interface which may affect the exchange of analytes between the phases [29], [30], [32]. Moreover, ultrasonic radiation produces a homogenisation of the sample [31], [33]. Taking this into account, ultrasound assisted emulsification–microextraction (USAEME) method avoids the use of the third component and takes advantage of the positive effects of ultrasounds in the liquid–liquid extraction procedures. This enables the achievement of more sensitive methods reducing the use of organic solvents and using clean energies such as ultrasonic radiation, in line with the growing trend of environmentally friendly chemistry. Since it was proposed, applications of USAEME in the analyses of several compounds such as pesticides, phenolic preservatives or 2,4,6-trichloroanisole in water have been reported [29], [34], [35]. In wine, USAEME has been successfully applied in the determination of 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, geosmin and 2-methylisoborneol [36], [37].

Therefore, in the present work, USAEME method was optimised for the determination of volatile phenols in wine by GC–tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). To perform the optimisation, once the extraction solvent had been selected, the influence of the volume ratio (Vextractant/Vsample), temperature, time and salt addition was evaluated using experimental design methodology. The optimised USAEME method was evaluated and its quality parameters were established. Then, its applicability was evaluated by analysing real wine samples. To our knowledge, this is the first time that USAEME has been proposed as a simple, fast and sensitive method for the determination of Brett character responsible compounds in wine.

Section snippets

Chemicals and standard solutions

EP, EG, VP and p-cresol (CR) (internal standard) were supplied by Aldrich Chemie (Steinheim, Germany). VG was purchased from Alpha Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). The purity of all standards was above 95%.

Chloroform and tetrachloroethylene were supplied by Scharlau (Barcelona, Spain). Carbon tetrachloride was purchased from Aldrich Chemie and chlorobenzene and carbon disulfide from Acros Organics (Geel, Belgium). Methanol was purchased from Merck (Darmstad, Germany) and sodium chloride from Aldrich

Extraction solvent selection

The extraction solvent for USAEME procedure must satisfy certain requirements in order to achieve a good recovery of the analytes. First of all, the extraction solvent must be suitable for liquid–liquid extraction of the analytes. Therefore, it must have low water solubility and high affinity with the compounds of interest. Since the analyses of the extracts will be accomplished by GC, the extraction solvent has to have good chromatographic behaviour. In addition, to facilitate the collection

Conclusions

In this paper, the USAEME method has been presented as a sensitive method for the determination of volatile phenols in wine. For this purpose, the USAEME procedure was optimised by evaluating the influence of different parameters on the recoveries of the target compounds. Then, the analytical performance of the optimised method was evaluated achieving satisfactory linearity and precision, and detection limits lower than the perception threshold of the target analytes. Moreover, the detection

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Autonomous Government of La RiojaConsejería de Educación, Cultura y Deporte – and the Spanish GovernmentMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación – for their financial support (Research grant FPI-2007 and project CTQ2008-03493/BQU) and Professor R. Phan-Tan-Luu of the University of Marseille (France) for providing the software NEMROD-W.

References (42)

  • H. Rodríguez et al.

    Int. J. Food Microbiol.

    (2009)
  • A.P. Pollnitz et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2000)
  • C. Domínguez et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (2002)
  • R. López et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2002)
  • D. Hernanz et al.

    Talanta

    (2008)
  • N. Martorell et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2002)
  • C. Pizarro et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • C. Pizarro et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • S. Boutou et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • C. Franc et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2009)
  • L. Fariña et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2007)
  • C. Pizarro et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2010)
  • C. Pizarro et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2011)
  • M. Rezaee et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2006)
  • A. Sarafraz-Yazdi et al.

    TrAC – Trends Anal. Chem.

    (2010)
  • J. Regueiro et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2008)
  • B. Abismail et al.

    Ultrason. Sonochem.

    (1999)
  • J. Regueiro et al.

    Talanta

    (2009)
  • A.R. Fontana et al.

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • C. Cortada et al.

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2011)
  • J.P. Towey et al.

    Am. J. Enol. Viticult.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (27)

    • 4-ethyphenol detection in wine by fullerene modified screen-printed carbon electrodes

      2022, Microchemical Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The formation of 4-ethylphenol takes place by decarboxylation of hydroxycinnamic acids by yeasts of the Brettanomyces/Dekkera bruxellensis genus, existing in the microflora of grapes [3-5]: they are first converted to hydroxystyrene by the action of hydroxycinnamate descarboxylase enzyme and subsequently reduced to ethyl derivatives by vinylphenol reductase enzyme. Furthermore, the concentration of 4-ethylphenol frequently increases during aging process and even after the wine is bottled, producing undesirable off-flavours to wine, described as animal odours, horse sweat, stable or varnish [1,2]. Thus, different analytical methods have been developed for the determination of this compound in wine quality control, being gas chromatographic techniques the most widely used including mass spectrometry detection [2,6-16] and, in a less extent, flame ionisation detection [17-21].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text