A Large-Scale Validation of an Improved Embryo-Rescue Protocol for the Obtainment of New Table-Grape Seedless Genotypes

Plants (Basel). 2023 Oct 3;12(19):3469. doi: 10.3390/plants12193469.

Abstract

The new trends in the consumption of table grapes and the growing interest in the environmental impact of this crop have pushed breeders toward the development of seedless cultivars endowed with resistance, through crossbreeding programs. To obtain seedless grapes, the use of embryo-rescue techniques is fundamental. In this research, a grape embryo-culture protocol was optimized and validated by using 39 cultivars and 41 cross-combinations carried out in the framework of a large private table grape program of the private network Italian Variety Club in the period 2017-2021 evaluating several factors, such as the improvement in embryo formation, germination and growth, and plantlet development. The embryo culture attitude of crosses between different combinations of seedless parents was assessed, and the rates of embryo development from the extracted ovules mostly ranged from 3.5 to 35.5% with 5 out of 43 genotypes outliers. Experiments conducted at different sampling times, in a range of 43-62 days after pollination (DAP), did not show significant differences between the samples analyzed, while the rate of embryos developed with the applied protocol proved its employability on multiple genotypes, although the grapevine genotype significantly influenced the technique efficiency.

Keywords: crosses; culture medium; embryo rescue; grapevine; sampling time.

Grants and funding

This research was entirely funded for the whole breeding program’s activities by the network Rete Italian Variety Club through its 23 private members and partially for the research activity by the Agritech National Research Center and received funding from the European Union Next-Generation EU (PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR)—MISSIONE 4 COMPONENTE 2, INVESTIMENTO 1.4—D.D. 1032 17/06/2022, CN00000022). This manuscript reflects only the authors’ views and opinions; neither the European Union nor the European Commission can be considered responsible for them.