Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Back Orders
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Experimental Fermentation with and without Pectic Enzymes

Frederick S. Morison
Am J Enol Vitic.  1950  1: 53-68  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1950.1.1.53
Frederick S. Morison
Cameo Vineyards
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Let us assume for the moment that no undesirable characteristics in wines develop from the use pf pectic enzymes. These experiments did not show any reason why pectic enzymes should not be used and, further, they did suggest some interesting possibilities.

For example: if the fermentation time can be shortened through the use of pectic enzymes, more grapes may be used at optimum maturity. At optimum maturity a higher percentage of the Brix is fermentable sugar, and this should be good for some increase in yield. And further, at optimum maturity flavor and color should be at their peak.

If pectic enzyme treated fermentations contain less residual reducing sugar, some increase in yield and less loss of sugar in pomace are possible consequences. At the same time, the use of pectic enzymes could make pomace easier to drain and press, and alcohol losses in pomace could be reduced thereby. One per cent of alcohol in pomace runs to lots of proof gallons of alcohol during a while crushing season. Hence, the less pomace from the press, the smaller the loss.

If pectic enzymes facilitate and speed up low temperature fermentations in full scale operation as they did in several of these experiments, a substantial saving of time is possible. If low temperature fermentations can be conducted without the addition of sulfur dioxide and can still produce wines of low volatile acidity, low temperature fermentation should be adopted more widely. Besides, there is presumably less alcohol evaporation loss from a low temperature fermentation than from one of high temperature -- another potential saving.

If the use of pectic enzymes in actual operation results in a more quiet fermentation -- that is, with less foam -- there should be less alcohol lost on account of bubble entrainment.

If the unpleasant sulfurous odors during fermentation are due to some action of the pectic enzyme on the sulfur dioxide added to fermenting juice, the desirability of learning how to make wine without sulfur dioxide would seem to be indicated.

The formation of volatile acid seemed to be connected with the length of time the fermentation took to approach dryness. Just why the fermentations containing Pectinol should be so much lower in volatile acid is not clear.

The last experiment, using a 35 Brix juice, suggests the possibility of making 16 per cent alcohol high-Balling wines by natural fermentation. Offhand it seems that they should be better flavored wines.

Some of these experiments ought to be repeated using freshly crushed grapes or fresh juice in place of grape concentrate. It is quite possible that there might then be some variation from the results reported here. Commercial size experiments might reveal still further variation in results because of mass action of large quantities.

  • Copyright 1950 by the American Society of Enology

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 1 Issue 1

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Experimental Fermentation with and without Pectic Enzymes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Experimental Fermentation with and without Pectic Enzymes
Frederick S. Morison
Am J Enol Vitic.  1950  1: 53-68  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1950.1.1.53
Frederick S. Morison
Cameo Vineyards
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Experimental Fermentation with and without Pectic Enzymes
Frederick S. Morison
Am J Enol Vitic.  1950  1: 53-68  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1950.1.1.53
Frederick S. Morison
Cameo Vineyards
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sensory and Chemical Characterization of Phenolic Polymers from Red Wine Obtained by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Back Orders

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2026 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire