Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Volume
    • AJEV and Catalyst Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Print on Demand
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access Publishing
    • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

The Glucose-Fructose Ratio of Vitis Vinifera Grapes

W. M. Kliewer
Am J Enol Vitic.  1967  18: 33-41  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1967.18.1.33
W. M. Kliewer
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Concentrations of glucose, fructose, and total soluble solids in the fruits of 28 table varieties, 26 red wine varieties, and 24 white wine varieties of Vitis vinifera L. were determined at an early and a late stage of maturity. All fruits were from virus-free vines grown at Davis, California. The glucose-fructose ratio of table varieties ranged from 0.74 to 0.97 (mean 0.91 for the slightly to moderately ripe fruits, and 0.83 for the very ripe to overripe fruits). The ratio for the wine varieties ranged from 0.74 to 1.05 (mean 0.94 for the early-harvested fruits, and 0.85 for the late-harvested fruits). In every variety there was either a decrease or no change in the glucose-fructose ratio between the early- and the late-harvested fruits.

Table varieties with relatively high amounts of fructose (glucose-fructose ratio less than 0.9) included Beauty Seedless, Black Corinth, Canner, Early Muscat, July Muscat, Loose Perlette, Niagara, Perlette and Black Monukka. High-fructose wine varieties were Chardonnay, Chasselas doré, Feher Szagos, Green Hungarian, Pinot blanc, Pinot gris and Red Veltliner.

Varieties that were relatively high in glucose (glucose-fructose ratio greater than 0.9) at the late stage of fruit maturity were Exotic, Malaga, and Muscat of Alexandria table varieties, and Burger, Chenin blanc, Early Burgundy, Emerald Riesling, Flora, Grey Riesling, La Rienha and Zinfandel wine varieties.

The glucose-fructose ratios of mature fruits from six varieties were lower during the warm 1966 season than during the cooler 1964 and 1965 seasons.

  • Accepted February 1967.
  • Published online January 1967
  • Copyright 1967 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 18 Issue 1

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Glucose-Fructose Ratio of Vitis Vinifera Grapes
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
The Glucose-Fructose Ratio of Vitis Vinifera Grapes
W. M. Kliewer
Am J Enol Vitic.  1967  18: 33-41  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1967.18.1.33
W. M. Kliewer
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
The Glucose-Fructose Ratio of Vitis Vinifera Grapes
W. M. Kliewer
Am J Enol Vitic.  1967  18: 33-41  ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1967.18.1.33
W. M. Kliewer
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
  • Leaf Blade versus Petiole Analysis for Nutritional Diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo
  • Mechanical Canopy and Crop-Load Management of Pinot gris in a Warm Climate
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Print on Demand

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access Publishing
  • AJEV Preprint and AI Software Policy
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Alerts
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2025 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire