Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

Yield and Compositional Differences Between Selections of Grapevine CV. Cabernet Sauvignon

J. R. Whiting, W. J. Hardie
Am J Enol Vitic. January 1981 32: 212-218; published ahead of print January 01, 1981 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1981.32.3.212
J. R. Whiting
Department of Agriculture, Sunraysia Horticultural Research Institute, Mildura, Australia 3500.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
W. J. Hardie
Department of Agriculture, Sunraysia Horticultural Research Institute, Mildura, Australia 3500.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Eight selections of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) cv. Cabernet Sauvignon from three international sources were compared for productivity, fruit composition and growth. Significant differences between selections were detected in each aspect. Selections I.V.69.2217 and R3V19E consistently outyielded all others. The greater yields were attributed to a combination of a greater number of clusters per vine, greater number of berries per cluster and greater berry weights. The cumulative yield of the Californian selection I.V.69.2217 was 19.6% and 18.7% greater than the popular Australian selections A.V.70.2259 and A.V.70.2351, respectively. Lowest cumulative yields were obtained from the French selections I.C.70.8157, I.C.70.8158 and I.C.70.8159.

Selection-dependent differences in the concentration of soluble solids and pH of the juice were consistently detected when fruit was harvested on the same date. Vegetative growth, measured as the weight of prunings removed during dormancy, was greatest in the selections R3V19E, R2VlW, and I.V.69.2217.

These results could not be attributed solely to differences arising from the incidence of virus-like diseases among the selections. The results support a genetic basis for at least part of the enhanced productivity achieved through selection.

  • Received February 1981.
  • Revision received April 1981.
  • Accepted April 1981.
  • Copyright 1981 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 32 Issue 3

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Yield and Compositional Differences Between Selections of Grapevine CV. Cabernet Sauvignon
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
Yield and Compositional Differences Between Selections of Grapevine CV. Cabernet Sauvignon
J. R. Whiting, W. J. Hardie
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1981  32: 212-218;  published ahead of print January 01, 1981 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1981.32.3.212

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
Yield and Compositional Differences Between Selections of Grapevine CV. Cabernet Sauvignon
J. R. Whiting, W. J. Hardie
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1981  32: 212-218;  published ahead of print January 01, 1981 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1981.32.3.212
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Sparkling Wines Produced from Alternative Varieties: Sensory Attributes and Evolution of Phenolics during Winemaking and Aging
  • Leaf Blade versus Petiole Analysis for Nutritional Diagnosis of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo
  • Mechanical Canopy and Crop-Load Management of Pinot gris in a Warm Climate
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire