Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
      • Proprietary Rights Notice for AJEV Online
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN

User menu

  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture
  • Log in
  • Follow ajev on Twitter
  • Follow ajev on Linkedin
American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • AJEV Content
    • Current Volume
    • Papers in Press
    • Archive
    • Best Papers
    • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
    • Collections
    • Free Sample Issue
  • Information For
    • Authors
    • Open Access and Subscription Publishing
    • Submission
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions and Reproductions
    • Advertisers
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Alerts
    • Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
  • Help
  • Login
  • ASEV MEMBER LOGIN
Article

White Wine Phenolics: Varietal and Processing Differences as Shown by HPLC

V. L. SINGLETON, EUGENE TROUSDALE
Am J Enol Vitic. January 1983 34: 27-34; published ahead of print January 01, 1983 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1983.34.1.27
V. L. SINGLETON
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
EUGENE TROUSDALE
Department of Viticulture and Enology, University of California, Davis, California 95616
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Find this author on ADS search
  • Find this author on Agricola
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Grape skin extracts and white wines with and without pomace contact were made for two vintages from Chenin blanc, French Colombard, Semillon, and Thompson Seedless. HPLC separated at least 124 substances absorbing in the ultraviolet. Seven of these have been identified and quantitated as gallic acid, caftaric acid, coutaric acid, catechin, epicatechin, astilbin, and engeletin. The retention times for these substances on three different reversed phase columns were different, but in the same sequence with coefficients of variation for known standards (5-7 replicates) typically 1-2% for retention time and 1.2-8.9% for peak area. Detection at 280, 292, or 320 nm gave considerably different absolute and relative peak areas depending on the absorbance maxima of the substances, but as long as the absorbance was appreciable and separation complete, fairly constant amounts were calculated. Contamination of the catechin peak with a substance having more absorbance at longer wavelengths illustrated a difficulty with direct quantitation by peak area alone on a complex chromatogram. Composition was similar within a grape variety and differed between varieties. Vintage differed also, but less so, but pomace contact made vary large compositional differences. Evidence is presented that specified components are added by extraction from seeds or skins and others are augmented or depleted by reactions such as hydrolysis and oxidation during processing.

  • Received June 1982.
  • Copyright 1983 by the American Society for Enology and Viticulture

Sign in for ASEV members

ASEV Members, please sign in at ASEV to access the journal online.

Sign in for Institutional and Non-member Subscribers

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Pay Per Article - You may access this article (from the computer you are currently using) for 2 day for US$10.00

Regain Access - You can regain access to a recent Pay per Article purchase if your access period has not yet expired.

Forgot your user name or password?

PreviousNext
Back to top

Vol 34 Issue 1

  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
View full PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on AJEV.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
White Wine Phenolics: Varietal and Processing Differences as Shown by HPLC
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from AJEV
(Your Name) thought you would like to read this article from the American Journal of Enology and Viticulture.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
You have accessRestricted access
White Wine Phenolics: Varietal and Processing Differences as Shown by HPLC
V. L. SINGLETON, EUGENE TROUSDALE
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1983  34: 27-34;  published ahead of print January 01, 1983 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1983.34.1.27

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
You have accessRestricted access
White Wine Phenolics: Varietal and Processing Differences as Shown by HPLC
V. L. SINGLETON, EUGENE TROUSDALE
Am J Enol Vitic.  January 1983  34: 27-34;  published ahead of print January 01, 1983 ; DOI: 10.5344/ajev.1983.34.1.27
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Save to my folders

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More from this TOC section

  • Glucose and Ethanol Tolerant Enzymes Produced by Pichia (Wickerhamomyces) Isolates from Enological Ecosystems
  • Sensory and Chemical Characterization of Phenolic Polymers from Red Wine Obtained by Gel Permeation Chromatography
  • N, P, and K Supply to Pinot noir Grapevines: Impact on Vine Nutrient Status, Growth, Physiology, and Yield
Show more Article

Similar Articles

AJEV Content

  • Current Volume
  • Papers in Press
  • Archive
  • Best Papers
  • ASEV National Conference Technical Abstracts
  • Collections
  • Free Sample Issue

Information For

  • Authors
  • Open Access/Subscription Publishing
  • Submission
  • Subscribers
  • Permissions and Reproductions
  • Advertisers

Alerts

  • Alerts
  • RSS Feeds

Other

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Feedback
  • Help
  • Catalyst
  • ASEV
asev.org

© 2023 American Society for Enology and Viticulture.  ISSN 0002-9254.

Powered by HighWire